OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

 View Only

Fwd: Re: [dita-comment] 1.3 troubleshooting topic permits empty remedy element?

  • 1.  Fwd: Re: [dita-comment] 1.3 troubleshooting topic permits empty remedy element?

    Posted 04-01-2015 12:29
    See the e-mail from George Bina below. Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [dita-comment] 1.3 troubleshooting topic permits empty remedy element? Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:17:59 +0300 From: George Bina <george@oxygenxml.com> To: dita-comment@lists.oasis-open.org Not an answer but an additional question on the same subject: The troubleshooting element allows task as its last child ((title),(titlealts)?,(abstract shortdesc)?,(prolog)?,(troublebody)?,(related-links)?,(task)*) and that task allows topic as its last child ((title),(titlealts)?,(abstract shortdesc)?,(prolog)?,(taskbody)?,(related-links)?,(topic)*) Can someone clarify what should the actual content model should be? Best Regards, George -- George Cristian Bina <oXygen/> XML Editor, Schema Editor and XSLT Editor/Debugger http://www.oxygenxml.com On 01/04/15 11:55, Joe Pairman wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a question about the DITA 1.3 troubleshooting topic, and I'm > sending it to dita-comment because I'm not sure how (if at all) this > question fits in the 1.3 review process. > > Working with the experimental org.dita.troubleshooting plugin bundled > with Oxygen 16.1, I noticed something about the content model for the > remedy element. It can be empty, but if it has /any/ content, it must > have one of steps, steps-unordered, or steps-informal. > > Is this intentional? Might there be a situation where an empty remedy > element is useful just to hang attributes on? If not, perhaps it would > be easier all round to disallow empty remedy elements. Here's the > relevant part of the DTD; removing the trailing question mark would > disallow the empty element. > > <!— LONG NAME: Remedy —> > <!ENTITY % remedy.content > “((%title;)?, (%responsibleParty;)?, > (%steps; > %steps-unordered; > %steps-informal;) > )?” >> > > > Thanks for any info or thoughts. > > Joe -- This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC. In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required before posting. Subscribe: dita-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org Unsubscribe: dita-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org List help: dita-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita-comment/ Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=dita Join OASIS: http://www.oasis-open.org/join/