MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















dita message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [dita] otherprops syntax - should we specify?




From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <ekimber@innodata-isogen.com>
To: Christopher Wong <cwong@idiominc.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:55:46 -0600






Christopher Wong wrote:

> Does anyone else know what other people do with otherprops?

I would think that any non-trivial use of DITA that needs to account for 
business-specific conditionality would quickly find the DITA-supplied 
conditions insufficient. Therefore I would assume that almost *any* use 
of DITA that needed conditionality would require additional condition 
types and valuds.

This would certainly be the case for any client I'm likely to have that 
wanted to implement a DITA-based XML application.

Cheers,

E.
-- 
W. Eliot Kimber
Professional Services
Innodata Isogen
9390 Research Blvd, #410
Austin, TX 78759
(512) 372-8122

ekimber@innodata-isogen.com
www.innodata-isogen.com







Follow-Ups:

RE: [dita] otherprops syntax - should we specify?
From: "Rob Frankland" <robf@rascalsoftware.com>



References:

Re: [dita] otherprops syntax - should we specify?
From: Christopher Wong <cwong@idiominc.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]