OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

 View Only
  • 1.  Groups - Proposal 13118: Ruby domain, DITA source uploaded

    Posted 10-21-2012 17:41
    Submitter's message Updates to address all TBDs -- Eliot Kimber Document Name : Proposal 13118: Ruby domain, DITA source Description DITA source and graphic for proposal 13118, Ruby domain. Download Latest Revision Public Download Link Submitter : Eliot Kimber Group : OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC Folder : Drafts Date submitted : 2012-10-21 10:40:35 Revision : 1


  • 2.  Re: [dita] Groups - Proposal 13118: Ruby domain, DITA source uploaded

    Posted 10-21-2012 19:23
    On 21.10.2012 19:40, Eliot Kimber wrote: > Submitter's message > Updates to address all TBDs Hi, please note that HTML5 allows nesting of ruby elements to express double annotations: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/single-page.html#the-ruby-element https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19214 Ruby domain proposal seems to prohibit such usage and is thus unable to capture all Ruby use-cases. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------ Attachment: signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature


  • 3.  Re: [dita] Groups - Proposal 13118: Ruby domain, DITA source uploaded

    Posted 10-22-2012 14:50
    Right you are--that appears to be a change from the original HTML5 design I based the domain on. I will update the proposal to allow nesting of <ruby> within <ruby>. Cheers, E. On 10/21/12 2:22 PM, "Jirka Kosek" <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: > On 21.10.2012 19:40, Eliot Kimber wrote: >> Submitter's message >> Updates to address all TBDs > > Hi, > > please note that HTML5 allows nesting of ruby elements to express double > annotations: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/single-page.html#the-ruby-element > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19214 > > Ruby domain proposal seems to prohibit such usage and is thus unable to > capture all Ruby use-cases. > > Jirka -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.rsicms.com www.rsuitecms.com Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press, http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/


  • 4.  Re: [dita] Groups - Proposal 13118: Ruby domain, DITA source uploaded

    Posted 10-22-2012 15:10
    Jirka, My reading of the 10/2012 HTML5 spec is that <ruby> may have either text or <ruby> as its first child, followed by any number of <rt> and <rp> elements, as specified in this RNC pattern: ruby.content = ((text ruby), (rp rt)*) Is that your understanding of the current rules? That is, that the text to which the parent <ruby> applies may itself have a nested ruby annotation. (For readers not yet familiar with RNC notation, "text" is a keyword corresponding to #PCDATA in DTD syntax, but in RNC patterns the use of "text" does not require the use of a repeating OR group as for DTDs, so you can specify precisely where text content is an isn't allowed. Do not confuse the RNC keyword "text" with the DITA element type <text>".) Cheers, E. On 10/21/12 2:22 PM, "Jirka Kosek" <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: > On 21.10.2012 19:40, Eliot Kimber wrote: >> Submitter's message >> Updates to address all TBDs > > Hi, > > please note that HTML5 allows nesting of ruby elements to express double > annotations: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/single-page.html#the-ruby-element > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19214 > > Ruby domain proposal seems to prohibit such usage and is thus unable to > capture all Ruby use-cases. > > Jirka -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.rsicms.com www.rsuitecms.com Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press, http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/


  • 5.  Re: [dita] Groups - Proposal 13118: Ruby domain, DITA source uploaded

    Posted 10-22-2012 20:58
    I have updated the Ruby proposal to allow nested <ruby> as per the 10/2012 HTML5 draft. I also updated <rt> to allow <text>, to make it consistent with our general principle of allowing <text> anywhere. I updated the sample topic to show the now three different configurations of <ruby> element allowed by the proposal. Cheers, E. On 10/21/12 2:22 PM, "Jirka Kosek" <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: > On 21.10.2012 19:40, Eliot Kimber wrote: >> Submitter's message >> Updates to address all TBDs > > Hi, > > please note that HTML5 allows nesting of ruby elements to express double > annotations: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/single-page.html#the-ruby-element > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19214 > > Ruby domain proposal seems to prohibit such usage and is thus unable to > capture all Ruby use-cases. > > Jirka -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.rsicms.com www.rsuitecms.com Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press, http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/