Are there any vendor concerns with this? I do not really expect any, but I
wanted to ask before making the change.
If not, then I will update the modules as follows:
* In each DTD and module, I'll use public IDs that include version 1.1
* In the catalog, I'll include the 1.1 IDs and the non-versioned IDs
* For any DTD or mod file, the non-versioned public ID means the most
recent version of that file
Thanks. The addition of version number in new DTDs and modules will hep us a lot.
FWIW, I will have to modify the catalogue and point the version without numbers to DITA 1.0. This will allow our tools to deal with DITA 1.0 and 1.1 indistinctly.
As a matter of process - does anybody know how bookmap should be
referenced? It is the first version of bookmap, but it is part of DITA 1.1
-- thus, should the module be called 1.0 or 1.1? Don suggested that OASIS
might already have naming guidelines for this sort of situation.