OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

 View Only

Re: [dita] Keywords in DITA

  • 1.  Re: [dita] Keywords in DITA

    Posted 03-08-2005 03:33
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    dita message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [dita] Keywords in DITA



    Hi Paul, welcome to the list.

    The reason we support keyword in both locations (as well as a bunch of specializations of keywords) is to allow the same range of semantic specificity in both places. For example, <apiname> is a type (specialization) of keyword. If we have an occurrence of an <apiname> in content, we may also want to index it specifically for search, if the occurrence is significant. So we add it to the keyword list for the topic. But just because it is a keyword for the topic doesn't mean it stops being an <apiname>. In both contexts, being able to distinguish <apiname>blue</apiname> from <wintitlel>blue</wintitle> is worthwhile. So we support the same keyword element in both places.

    In other words, <apiname> as content and <apiname> as keyword for search are both still <apiname>s, so it doesn't make sense to have a different set of elements just because they are processed differently: their containment context (body or prolog)  is enough, and allows us to infer processing behavior without undermining the common semantics.

    Michael Priestley
    mpriestl@ca.ibm.com




    "Paul Prescod" <paul.prescod@blastradius.com>

    03/07/2005 08:28 PM

    To
    <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
    cc
    Subject
    [dita] Keywords in DITA





    In computer science there are two meanings for the word "Keyword". One
    is, as Docbook puts it, "a term describing the content of a document.
    The keyword applies to the document component that contains it. Keywords
    are rarely displayed to a reader. Usually, they are reserved for
    searching and retrieval purposes." FOLDOC[1] says: "A small set of words
    designed to convey the subject of a technical article." So the DITA
    Language Reference examples of "installing", "uninstalling", "wizards",
    etc. seems to suggest this usage.

    Then there are keywords in computer languages and command lines. In
    other words: "A single value from an enumerated list, the name of a
    command or parameter, or a lookup key for a message" FOLDOC[1] says:
    "One of a fixed set of symbols built into the syntax of a language.
    Typical keywords would be if, then, else, print, goto, while, switch."
    The DITA Language Reference example of "<p>The <keyword>assert</keyword>
    pragma statement allows messages to be passed to the emulator,
    pre-compiler, etc..." seems to ALSO suggest this usage.

    I infer from the examples in the DITA specification that I should use
    keyword in the FIRST sense if it occurs within the "keywords" element
    and in the SECOND sense if it occurs in document content. Is that
    correct? If so, I feel that it is somewhat of a confusing combination.
    ----
    Paul Prescod
    Blast Radius XMetaL



    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]