Dear Eliot, Yesterday we have discussed your proposals in our DITA Machine Industry Subcommittee meeting and came to the following conclusion: Moving the quantities and tolerances elements into an mi domain: - we do not agree to that idea, as quantities and tolerances are not limited to the machine industry. We recommend to have it as part of the base or technical section. Adding the prefix mi to the quantities and tolerances elements: - we do not agree to that idea, as quantities and tolerances are not limited to the machine industry. Using elements (derived from <data>) for <unitofmeasure> and <systemofmeasurement> instead of attributes - we agree to this idea Best regards Chris -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von:
dita@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:
dita@lists.oasis-open.org ] Im Auftrag von Eliot Kimber Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2012 17:31 An: Chris Kravogel Cc: dita Betreff: [dita] Machine Industry Proposal: Using Subelements For Attributes Chris, Here is the proposal with attributes redefined as subelements specialized from <data>. Cheers, E. -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368
www.rsicms.com www.rsuitecms.com Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press,
http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/