OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

 View Only

  • 1.  Minutes for DITA TC Meeting, 16 Feb 2010

    Posted 02-16-2010 17:14
      |   view attached

    Attachment(s)

    txt
    16Feb2010Minutes.txt   5 KB 1 version


  • 2.  acknowledgements [was: Minutes for DITA TC Meeting, 16 Feb 2010]

    Posted 02-20-2010 22:26 
    
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Day [mailto:dond@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2010 February 16 12:14
> To: DITA TC list
> Subject: [dita] Minutes for DITA TC Meeting, 16 Feb 2010
> 
> Agenda for 16 February 2010 DITA TC Meeting/Call

>        6. Acknowledgments in DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they
contain?
>           o
> http://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/201002/msg00033.html
>  (Eberlein, 9 February 2010)
> >Kristen summarized. Concerns are how to avoid leaving out anyone who
> has
> done a lot of work. Consensus: Criterion is that list must include
> those
> who have actively contributed as Members during 1.2
> development(proposals,
> authors, commenters, implementors of the DTDs and XSDs).
> >Action for Gershon to prepare this list.

There is a difference between editors of a spec and 
membership in the TC that develops a spec.

I suggest that what Gershon should prepare is a list
of "editors" (and he can interpret that as he wishes,
but I would tend to stick to authors of text and schemas,
not commentors and reviewers).

Then we have some section (I would not call it Acknowledg(e)ments)
that says something like:

 The DITA 1.2 specification is a product of the OASIS DITA
 Technical Committee.  The committee members at the time
 of publication were:

 [and then list all current members of the TC]

paul


  • 3.  RE: [dita] acknowledgements [was: Minutes for DITA TC Meeting, 16 Feb2010]

    Posted 02-23-2010 00:50 
    I agree in principle, Paul - though I would need more discussion of whether other roles besides Editor/Authors should be acknowledged, and how we phrase the acknowledgement so as not to obscure the fact that everyone who at least spoke up at some point in the development of this of that feature actively participated in the 1.2's development.

--Dana

-----Original Message-----
From: Grosso, Paul [mailto:pgrosso@ptc.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2010 2:26 PM
To: DITA TC list
Subject: [dita] acknowledgements [was: Minutes for DITA TC Meeting, 16 Feb 2010]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Day [mailto:dond@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2010 February 16 12:14
> To: DITA TC list
> Subject: [dita] Minutes for DITA TC Meeting, 16 Feb 2010
> 
> Agenda for 16 February 2010 DITA TC Meeting/Call

>        6. Acknowledgments in DITA 1.2 spec -- what should they
contain?
>           o
> http://www.oasis-
> open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/201002/msg00033.html
>  (Eberlein, 9 February 2010)
> >Kristen summarized. Concerns are how to avoid leaving out anyone who
> has
> done a lot of work. Consensus: Criterion is that list must include
> those
> who have actively contributed as Members during 1.2
> development(proposals,
> authors, commenters, implementors of the DTDs and XSDs).
> >Action for Gershon to prepare this list.

There is a difference between editors of a spec and 
membership in the TC that develops a spec.

I suggest that what Gershon should prepare is a list
of "editors" (and he can interpret that as he wishes,
but I would tend to stick to authors of text and schemas,
not commentors and reviewers).

Then we have some section (I would not call it Acknowledg(e)ments)
that says something like:

 The DITA 1.2 specification is a product of the OASIS DITA
 Technical Committee.  The committee members at the time
 of publication were:

 [and then list all current members of the TC]

paul


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php


Related Content