OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

 View Only

RE: [dita] Translation SC proposals for xml:lang and dir attributes

  • 1.  RE: [dita] Translation SC proposals for xml:lang and dir attributes

    Posted 04-04-2006 14:10
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    dita message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [dita] Translation SC proposals for xml:lang and dir attributes


    Hi Bruce,
    
    Please see my comments below. 
    
    Best Regards,
    Gershon
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Esrig, Bruce (Bruce) [mailto:esrig@lucent.com] 
    Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 4:54 PM
    To: 'gershon@tech-tav.com'
    Cc: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: RE: [dita] Translation SC proposals for xml:lang and dir attributes
    
    Hi Gershon,
    
    1. After the following sentence in the xml:lang proposal
    
    > Applications that process DITA documents, whether at the authoring,
    translation, publishing, or any other stage, should fully support the
    Unicode algorithm to correctly implement the script for each language used
    in the document. 
    
    Should we cross-reference the dir proposal?
    
    "However, when implementing the language specification features of the
    Unicode algorithm, see also the discussion of the dir attribute, where it is
    stated that the use of the dir attribute is preferred rather than use of the
    special embedded Unicode LTR, RTL, LRO, and RLO characters."
    
    <Gershon>Good idea. Let's discuss this at the TC meeting to see if anyone
    has objections...</Gershon>
    
    2. With regard to the following disclaimer in the dir proposal
    
    > Because input is unpredictably dependent on eventual output, it is not
    sufficient to apply the "dir" attribute in such a way as to make the XML
    appear as it should in an editor.
    
    Are there any provisions to ensure that users will have fall-back methods in
    case the use of the dir attribute is not sufficient to achieve proper
    processing?
    
    Is the fall-back method to request an upgrade of a processing engine or
    browser or other presentation system? Is it intended that using the Unicode
    LTR, RTL, LRO, and RLO characters will not be supported as a workaround?
    This seems to be the effect of the note to vendors/implementers.
    
    <Gershon>The note on output is essentially a caution to users that they
    should check their outputs, since correct markup in the editor does not
    always ensure correct rendering of the output. We don't want to suggest
    using the Unicode markers as a workaround, though of course this may work
    for some tools. Ideally, we'd like to see vendors fully and correctly
    supporting the Unicode standards. ("we" being the DITA TC, W3C TCs and
    Unicode TCs)</Gershon>
    
    > When reading XML markup that embeds the Unicode Bidirectional markers,
    these markers should be replaced with markup when the document is saved.
    
    Would it make sense to permit in the specification that vendors/implementers
    may make it possible for authors to explicitly request that the Unicode LTR,
    RTL, LRO, and RLO characters are preserved in violation of the recommended
    practice? This would be allowed in tools whose output is provided to
    applications that do not comply. But a tool would still be out of compliance
    with the specification if its output fails to comply with the specification
    when the user saves a document without requesting a violation of the
    recommended practice.
    
    <Gershon>This part of the spec is a recommendation for best practices, and
    not an enforcement. As such, I prefer to leave it as-is, since we're in sync
    with the W3C X/HTML standards and the Unicode BIDI spec, which strongly
    discourage embedding directional markers. Tools that do embed markers are
    still compliant with DITA (and X/HTML and Unicode) specs, but do not
    implement BIDI the recommended way.</Gershon>
    
    
    Best wishes,
    
    Bruce
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Gershon L Joseph [mailto:gershon@tech-tav.com]
    Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 9:30 AM
    To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
    Subject: [dita] Translation SC proposals for xml:lang and dir attributes
    
    
    Hi all,
    
    Today the Translation subcommittee finalized our proposals for the xml:lang
    and dir attributes for inclusion in DITA 1.1. Please review these proposals
    for discussion and approval during tomorrow's TC meeting.
    
    Best Regards,
    Gershon
    
    ---
    Gershon L Joseph
    Member, OASIS DITA and DocBook Technical Committees Director of Technology
    and Single Sourcing Tech-Tav Documentation Ltd.
    office: +972-8-974-1569
    mobile: +972-57-314-1170
    http://www.tech-tav.com
    
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]