Robert,
I would welcome a general table of the contains/contained by for each of
the doctypes. That would be easier to review than the embedded
information in the elements.
JoAnn
JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD
President
Comtech Services, Inc.
710 Kipling Street, Suite 400
Denver CO 80215
303-232-7586
joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert D Anderson [mailto:robander@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 8:53 AM
To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [dita] Jeff's (Arbortext) DITA 1.1 Language Ref comments...
Hi Paul -
> The statement "Note: The actual contains or contained-by information
> displayed here may differ slightly, depending on whether the element
> is used in a map, bookmap, stand-alone topic, or composite file
> (ditabase)" appears on many more elements than I expected (I expected
> it on topic, task, concept, and reference).
I was also startled to see how often it popped up. The main reason for
this actually came from domains, rather than from topic types. For
example, the keyword element may appear in many places within a topic,
including inside the element. Keyword can also be used inside maps;
however, maps do not have the highlighting domain, so is not
available. Thus, the model differs between maps and topics. Likewise,
anything that can contain keywords and appears in both maps and topics
will have this problem -- in maps,