I think it's a good idea and would be willing to help. We might discover some additional needs for glossary redesign this way, too. --Scott Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 14, 2020, at 7:24 AM, Dr. Stanley Doherty <
stan@modularwriting.com> wrote: > > ïHi -- > > I am completing a formal glossary of DITA terminology for an Oracle DITA authoring spec. As has been mentioned in TC meetings in the past, our own TC terminology resides in <dlentry>s in separate terminology topics, not in glossentry topics. > > <topicref href="../archSpec/base/dita-terminology.dita"> > <topicref href="../archSpec/base/normative-and-non-normative-information.dita"/> > <topicref href="../archSpec/base/notation.dita"/> > <topicref href="../archSpec/base/basic-dita-terminology.dita"/> > <topicref href="../archSpec/base/specialization-terminology.dita"/> > <topicref href="../archSpec/base/dita-modules.dita"/> > <topicref href="../archSpec/base/linking-and-addressing-terms.dita"/> > <topicref href="../archSpec/base/key-terminology.dita"/> > <topicref href="../archSpec/base/map-terminology.dita"/> > <topicref href="../archSpec/base/fileext.dita"/> > </topicref> > > Just testing the waters. Is it time to implement that same content in glossentry topics? If interest is there, I'll volunteer to work on it solo or with someone. > > What's the temperature in the room? > > :-) > > Stan