OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

 

> 

                                                

					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
                                                

                                                    
                                                        
                                                        Original Message
                                                
                                                Original Message-----
> From: Komarla, Shalini [mailto:Shalini_Komarla@BMC.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, 2007 November 13 13:11
> To: DITA TC List
> Subject: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 13 
> November 2007
> 
> Please find the meeting minutes enclosed.
> 

These are excellent minutes for a "first timer"--I'm sure
you'll be asked again ("no good deed goes unpunished").

Regarding:

3. ITEM: URI Scheme for TC Subcommittees (Sirois) 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200710/msg00000.html 
continued from last week 
NOTE: Include discussion of domain name isolation--naming
    best practice for SCs? 
- Procedural standards for TC. 
- Jeff Ogden's comments were discussed.
- Decision to revise the document with Jeff's comments
    and present it as a single document. 
- Revise the document to use "spec family" instead of "family"
   (family is too generic)

I'll admit to spacing out a bit during this conversion--I
don't have strong feelings about the details of the 
outcome--but I thought we decided to go with just "spec"
for the path segment in question.

Don, Erik, what do you believe we decided?

paul

Hi, Paul and Shalini:


Regarding:


"Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote on 11/13/2007 11:29:07 AM:

>  

> 3. ITEM: URI Scheme for TC Subcommittees (Sirois)

> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200710/msg00000.html

>

> I'll admit to spacing out a bit during this conversion--I

> don't have strong feelings about the details of the

> outcome--but I thought we decided to go with just "spec"

> for the path segment in question.



I also thought we agreed to go with just "spec" on the grounds that


*  The main purpose of the leading portion of the URN is to distinguish this group of names from others

*  The specialization name is the main semantic freight of the URN


Therefore, the distinguishing step should be relatively short.



Thanks for catching that, Paul, and for the crisp notes, Shalini,



Erik Hennum

ehennum@us.ibm.com

I checked Shalini's notes before they went out. so I should have caught
that item. Thanks for noting that the agreed-on token will be just "spec"
in Eric's final update. I'll reference this summary note as the amendment
to the minutes for the next business meeting.  Thanks, again, Shalini.

Regards,
--
Don Day
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Chair, IBM DITA Architects Board
Email: dond@us.ibm.com
11501 Burnet Rd. MS9033E015, Austin TX 78758
Phone: +1 512-244-2868 (home office)

"Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
 Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"
   --T.S. Eliot


                                                                           
             Erik                                                          
             Hennum/Oakland/IB                                             
             M@IBMUS                                                    To 
                                       "Grosso, Paul"