OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

 View Only
  • 1.  DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 13 November 2007

    Posted 11-13-2007 19:20
      |   view attached

    Attachment(s)

    txt
    DitaTC-MM-11132007.txt   3 KB 1 version


  • 2.  RE: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 13 November 2007

    Posted 11-13-2007 19:29
     
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Komarla, Shalini [mailto:Shalini_Komarla@BMC.com] 
    > Sent: Tuesday, 2007 November 13 13:11
    > To: DITA TC List
    > Subject: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 13 
    > November 2007
    > 
    > Please find the meeting minutes enclosed.
    > 
    
    These are excellent minutes for a "first timer"--I'm sure
    you'll be asked again ("no good deed goes unpunished").
    
    Regarding:
    
    3. ITEM: URI Scheme for TC Subcommittees (Sirois) 
    http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200710/msg00000.html 
    continued from last week 
    NOTE: Include discussion of domain name isolation--naming
        best practice for SCs? 
    - Procedural standards for TC. 
    - Jeff Ogden's comments were discussed.
    - Decision to revise the document with Jeff's comments
        and present it as a single document. 
    - Revise the document to use "spec family" instead of "family"
       (family is too generic)
    
    I'll admit to spacing out a bit during this conversion--I
    don't have strong feelings about the details of the 
    outcome--but I thought we decided to go with just "spec"
    for the path segment in question.
    
    Don, Erik, what do you believe we decided?
    
    paul
    


  • 3.  RE: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 13 November 2007

    Posted 11-13-2007 20:16

    Hi, Paul and Shalini:

    Regarding:

    "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote on 11/13/2007 11:29:07 AM:
    >  
    > 3. ITEM: URI Scheme for TC Subcommittees (Sirois)
    > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200710/msg00000.html
    >
    > I'll admit to spacing out a bit during this conversion--I
    > don't have strong feelings about the details of the
    > outcome--but I thought we decided to go with just "spec"
    > for the path segment in question.

    I also thought we agreed to go with just "spec" on the grounds that

    * The main purpose of the leading portion of the URN is to distinguish this group of names from others
    * The specialization name is the main semantic freight of the URN

    Therefore, the distinguishing step should be relatively short.


    Thanks for catching that, Paul, and for the crisp notes, Shalini,


    Erik Hennum
    ehennum@us.ibm.com



  • 4.  RE: [dita] DITA Technical Committee Meeting Minutes: 13 November 2007

    Posted 11-15-2007 18:27
    I checked Shalini's notes before they went out. so I should have caught
    that item. Thanks for noting that the agreed-on token will be just "spec"
    in Eric's final update. I'll reference this summary note as the amendment
    to the minutes for the next business meeting.  Thanks, again, Shalini.
    
    Regards,
    --
    Don Day
    Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
    Chair, IBM DITA Architects Board
    Email: dond@us.ibm.com
    11501 Burnet Rd. MS9033E015, Austin TX 78758
    Phone: +1 512-244-2868 (home office)
    
    "Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge?
     Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?"
       --T.S. Eliot
    
    
                                                                               
                 Erik                                                          
                 Hennum/Oakland/IB                                             
                 M@IBMUS                                                    To 
                                           "Grosso, Paul"