OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

 View Only

RE: [dita] DITA 1.1 issue 20: Extensible metadata attributes

  • 1.  RE: [dita] DITA 1.1 issue 20: Extensible metadata attributes

    Posted 06-03-2005 14:26
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    dita message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [dita] DITA 1.1 issue 20: Extensible metadata attributes


    Epic handles both DTDs and XML Schemas. When using a DTD,
    any prefixed (namespaced) attribute not declared in the DTD is
    allowed.
     
    Namespacing attributes is an easy way to allow arbitrary attributes
    to be added without having to modify the DTD or schema and, at
    the same time, to make it easy to recognize and provide special
    processing for a certain set of attributes.
     
    paul


    From: Christopher Wong [mailto:cwong@idiominc.com]
    Sent: Friday, 03 June, 2005 9:00
    To: Paul Grosso
    Cc: DITA TC list
    Subject: Re: [dita] DITA 1.1 issue 20: Extensible metadata attributes

    Isn't Epic's DITA support still DTD-based? How would namespacing extensions to %select-atts; help in DTD-land?

    Chris

    Paul Grosso wrote:
    I haven't thought a lot about this yet, but I was having
    a discussion with some of our developers today who also
    felt the need for extensible metadata attributes, and 
    they felt the right way to do it was to have a separate
    namespace for metadata attributes.  
    
    Then the DITA schema could allow any attribute in
    that namespace on any element, so it would be easy 
    to add "profiling" attributes or other metadata.
    
    paul 
    
      
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Christopher Wong [mailto:cwong@idiominc.com] 
    Sent: Wednesday, 01 June, 2005 17:15
    To: DITA TC list
    Subject: [dita] DITA 1.1 issue 20: Extensible metadata attributes
    
    Could I get an idea from our XML gurus how this could be 
    achieved in a 
    compatible manner? The issues list does not quite have a lot 
    of details.