OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

On Friday, in the context of designing a new specialization for a client, I
noticed that section-div is not allowed within li.

I'm not sure what the finally-approved proposal said but it was certainly my
intent/assumption that section-div would be allowed essentially anywhere 

is allowed.

By that logic, I would be inclined to argue that the lack of section-div in
li (and similar elements, e.g., dd, etc.) is a bug. Having forgotten the
original discussion and thinking only of the base semantics of section-div,
I found it surprising that it was not included in li.

I'm not making a proposal at this time but would like to discuss the issue
to determine if it is really a bug or if the proposal as approved explicitly
dealt with this case.

Cheers,

E.

----
Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc.
email:  ekimber@reallysi.com 

Hi - just to aid in discussion of the item, here is the proposal that was
approved Nov 13, 2007:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/25904/12021.html

The only changes were slight amendments on April 29, 2008 explicitly
calling out conbodydiv, refbodydiv, and approving the addition of
sectiondiv to other section specializations:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200804/msg00102.html

Robert D Anderson
IBM Authoring Tools Development
Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit

Eliot Kimber