I agree with this. I would adjust the last sentence to "This is true even if the peer map would have a higher key definition precedence." If the referenced peer map already has a lower precedence then there's no issue, I think it's clearer to highlight the specific case in question. Cheers, E. ————— Eliot Kimber, Owner Contrext, LLC
http://contrext.com On 12/9/14, 11:51 AM, "Chris Nitchie" <
chris.nitchie@oberontech.com> wrote: >1. If a map contains a reference to another DITA map with scope="peer" and >keyscope set to some value, and that peer map cannot be loaded by the >processor for whatever reason, the processor SHOULD issue a warning. > >2. A key reference for which no definition is available MUST always issue >an error. If that key reference specifies a scope prefix matching the >scope name on a peer mapref referring to unavailable content, processors >MAY issue additional verbiage stating that the key might be defined in a >currently-unavailable peer map. > >3. If a key reference specifies a scope prefix matching the scope name on >a peer mapref referring to unavailable content, but the local map's key >space also includes a definition for that key, the key resolves to the >local map definition, and no message should be issued by the processor. >That is, it is treated as a normal, resolvable key reference. This is true >regardless of the relative precedence of the local definition and the peer >mapref. > >Chris > > >Chris Nitchie >(734) 330-2978 >
chris.nitchie@oberontech.com >www.oberontech.com > <
http://www.oberontech.com/ > >Follow us: > <
https://www.facebook.com/oberontech > > <
https://twitter.com/oberontech > > <
http://www.linkedin.com/company/oberon-technologies > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >