OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC

 View Only

[dita-translation] TC/DITA/Translation Subcommittee Proposals

  • 1.  [dita-translation] TC/DITA/Translation Subcommittee Proposals

    Posted 03-14-2006 14:24
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    dita message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: [dita-translation] TC/DITA/Translation Subcommittee Proposals


     
    
    -
     
    
    From: JoAnn Hackos, chair DITA/Translation Subcommittee 
     
    The DITA/Translation Subcommittee approved the following proposals to
    the DITA TC on March 13, 2006.
     
    DIR Attribute
    Proposal: That the DITA 1.1 specification include the DIR attribute as a
    universal attribute with the values of LTR, RTL, LRO, and RLO. No
    default value is to be specified for the DITA DTD.
     
    Discussion: The DIR attribute is used by authors of languages such as
    Hebrew and Arabic to ensure that correct directionality on the output,
    especially when the standard directionality has to be modified to
    accommodate some special use of the language. The reason to include it
    is to ensure that tools for authoring and for transforms generate the
    correct directionality. There was discussion that the results of this
    would often be unpredictable and produce different effects for different
    browers. The SC will now work on a statement of best practices for
    authors and tools vendors to develop a way to handle the dir attribute
    properly.
     
    Ruby Attribute/element
    Proposal: That the Subcommittee postpone any consideration of ruby
    enable until there is an appropriate mechanism (e.g., a specialization
    of the <keyref> attribute or a recommendation from the ITS working group
    of the W3C) to enable it in the DITA DTD.
    
    Discussion: The ruby attribute/element is used in some languages to
    provide an annotation indicating how certain characters should be
    pronounced. It is used in Japanese textbooks to guide a reader in the
    pronunciation of lesser known characters. At present, we have not
    received a specific request to enable ruby and the ITS working group has
    not yet completed its draft recommendation. The SC believes it is better
    to wait until we have a means to enable this attribute before making a
    recommendation to the TC. We hope to reconsider this proposal for the
    DITA 1.2 specification.
    
    Xml:lang Attribute
    Proposal: That the DITA 1.1 specification maintain the xml:lang
    attributed as currently specified in DITA 1.0. That specification stated
    that xml:lang values are validated by RFC3066 or its successors.
    
    Discussion: A considerable discussion on this attribute has occurred
    over several weeks, because of the potential problems with specifying
    its value correctly. Because DITA DTD does not specify what values are
    correct, it's possible that authors could enter incorrect values. The
    correct values are in the RFC3066. The best practice discussion now
    centers on recommending that xml authoring tools or CM systems provide
    standard lists of values from which authors can choose. For example,
    authors should correctly enter a combination of language and locale as
    follows: fr-fr or fr-ca specifies French or French Canadian.
    
    
     
     
    
    JoAnn 
    
    JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD 
    President 
    Comtech Services, Inc. 
    710 Kipling Street, Suite 400 
    Denver, CO 80215 
    303-232-7586 
    joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com 
    http://www.comtech-serv.com <http://www.comtech-serv.com/>  
    Skype joannhackos
    
    
    
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]