I've attached a PDF that strings together all of the topics containing <example> elements in the Architectural Spec portion of the DITA 1.3 spec. I extracted these from the DITA source, so unfortunately there's no context (chapter/topic numbering or other information about their place in the hierarchy) from the spec as a whole. The order of the topics at least is the same as they appear in the spec. mag On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 9:06 PM Nancy Harrison <
nharrison@infobridge-solutions.com > wrote: are here: ActionItems: 1. Nancy will create mockup of 2.0 techcomm package, especially grammar files. 2. Kris will send out announceent to other TC members to see if they want to join TC dinner at DiTA/NA 3. Kris will provide more info about Weds. panel for online agenda; will ping dawn about it; Kris and Robert have 2.0 slides to provide, but would like to see slides from any TC members doing a 2.0 presentation 4. Tom will create a summary of examples in arch spec. 5. All TC members: look thru Chris's conformance email and 1.3 normative statements; what's missing? what's duplicative? what's nonsensical? How should we mark them up so we can get a clean extraction to build an appendix? Minutes will be out as soon as I get a small piece of missing data. _____________ Nancy Harrison Infobridge Solutions
nharrison@infobridge-solutions.com Attachment: dita13_archspec_examples.pdf Description: Adobe PDF document