Michael Priestley wrote:
>
> Re:
> >What is the justification for having this shared parameter entity name
> >(info-types) and why can't we define topic-specific parameter entities
> >that allow us to have a single conherent set of declarations that
> >encompasses all of the topic element types?
>
> The idea is to provide control over how a particular doctype allows
> nesting of different topic types:
> - If you just want a general bucket that allows any type as root and any
> type nesting, you can use