OASIS Emergency Management TC

 View Only

Re: [emergency] Geolocation E911 Patented

  • 1.  Re: [emergency] Geolocation E911 Patented

    Posted 07-08-2005 16:41
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [emergency] Geolocation E911 Patented


    On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 09:52 -0600, Carl Reed OGC wrote:
    > Anyway, in the Geo space, most patents are frivolous. There is a tremendous 
    > amount of prior art in the GIS industry. The problem is that many companies 
    > that apply for patents in the geo space have no idea of what has been done 
    > before. The problem is exacerbated by a US Patent Office (or should I say 
    > policy) that simply cannot properly evaluate all the patents being applied 
    > for.
    
    I'm sure many of them know exactly what has been done before. It is
    pretty hard for an independent developer to go up against a company
    holding a patent, if nothing else but for the fact that they will pull
    the process out and make it last long enough to put you out of business
    (I've worked at some places that take this exact approach - they will
    outspend you in order to win - and the first one to fall sets
    precedence).
    
    A company down the road from me by the name of Acacia is the prime
    example of this:
    
    "... Among the acquired patents are those covering technology related to
    broadcast equipment, credit card receipt processing, peer to peer
    network communications, spreadsheet programs, datamatrix bar codes and
    image resolution or enhancements."
    
    Patent Name: Audio and video receiving and transmission system (no, this
    is not a joke)
    
    They exist solely to extract money using the outspend and profit model.
    And they aren't the only ones.
    
    http://www.eff.org/patent/wanted/patent.php?p=acacia
    http://www.fightthepatent.com/
    
    > This said, it is hard to determine whether the IP 911 patent meets the 
    > requirements for a patent. Below my signature is a really nice synopsis (I 
    > must confess I wrote this so I hope it is correct!) of what constitutes a 
    > valid patent under US law.
    
    It doesn't, which is why I posted it. Many carrier networks are IP-based
    and/or have IP overlay. Proximity services are nothing new. Their
    so-called unique combination of functionality is really not unique at
    all.
    
    Cheers
    Kon
    
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]