OASIS Emergency Management TC

 View Only

Re: [emergency] California Investigates Lapses in a Tardy Tsunami Warning

  • 1.  Re: [emergency] California Investigates Lapses in a Tardy Tsunami Warning

    Posted 06-25-2005 18:13
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [emergency] California Investigates Lapses in a Tardy Tsunami Warning


    A lot of this appears to be embarrassed finger-pointing by local  
    officials whose shops got the messages from the state but dropped the  
    ball internally.
    
    However, there's a significant sidebar to this.  There are two  
    tsunami warning centers for the Pacific region.  The one in Alaska  
    provides warnings to the U.S. and Canadian west coast.  The one in  
    Hawaii serves the rest of the Pacific rim.  When the quake occurred  
    off the California coast, the Alaska center issued a tsunami warning  
    for the (relatively) nearby shorelines, while almost simultaneously  
    the Hawaii center issued a "no warning" notice for other areas.
    
    Both messages went out over the NOAA "weather wire" satellite  
    distribution, and a number of folks (including both government staff  
    and news-folk) got both, didn't read the full (and relatively  
    lengthy) messages carefully, and got confused.  As tends to happen,  
    their embarrassment set off a massive blamefest.
    
    So what we have here, at least in part, is a vivid illustration of  
    why effective geospatial targeting of messages is so crucial.  There  
    are a number of situations in which seemingly-contradictory  
    instructions can be issued simultaneously to adjacent areas... e.g.,  
    hurricane watch/warning bands, explosive-threat evacuation and  
    shelter-in-place orders and the like.
    
    The use of specific geospatial features instead of political or  
    administrative boundaries for targeting warning messages is probably  
    the single most important innovation included in CAP, and this  
    episode is a vivid example of why it matters so much.
    
    - Art
    
    
    On Jun 21, 2005, at 12:11 PM, Aymond, Patti wrote:
    > http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/21/national/21warning.html
    >
    > Patti Iles Aymond, PhD
    >
    > Senior Scientist
    >
    > Bioterrorism Preparedness & Response
    >
    > Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
    > Managing Risk in a Complex World
    >
    > 8555 United Plaza Blvd.   Suite 100
    >
    > Baton Rouge, LA 70809
    >
    > (225) 952-8228 (phone)
    >
    > (225) 952-8122 (fax)
    >
    >
    > IEM CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ OUR NOTICE:
    > http://www.ieminc.com/e_mail_confidentiality_notice.html
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]