Hi David,
I'm including the TC in this reply, so it will get into everyone's inbox.
Everyone: the comments David refers to are in my reply to his earlier
message (entire thread below for the record).
I will be looking at ebMS. Can't say how it will fit till I do.
Cheers,
Rex
David RR Webber (XML) wrote:
> Rex,
> Looks like you only sent this to me? Please cc list if that was an
> oversight!
> WRT complexity - yes, yes, and yes!
> Obviously the CAM work I'm doing is focused on reducing complexity of
> doing NIEM xsd.
> Likewise I was trying to get a REST initiative going for regrep. We
> have the subcommittee and charter done - just need folks to show up
> and complete the work ; -)
> Having a REST interface saves you from the gory details of ebRIM - and
> makes the whole thing much easier to implement.
> Everyone is grappling with the same set of challenges in ensuring
> robust message exchanges with extended deliver control and routing.
> The ebMS work has always provided for that - and now with V3 - I'm
> seeing this mature from real world experience in implementations - and
> actually having real use case needs. Always a good sign. It may not be
> completely simple - but at least everything in one place and API.
> Having the grapple with multiple XML layers in a stack to achieve the
> same thing is always likely to be more challenging.
>
> Thanks, DW
>
>