OASIS Emergency Management TC

 View Only

Re: [emergency] Groups - CAP 1.1 Subcommittee Draft(CAP_1.1-draft_1-4-05) uploaded

  • 1.  Re: [emergency] Groups - CAP 1.1 Subcommittee Draft(CAP_1.1-draft_1-4-05) uploaded

    Posted 01-18-2005 12:56
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [emergency] Groups - CAP 1.1 Subcommittee Draft(CAP_1.1-draft_1-4-05) uploaded


    At last, a constructive suggestion!  Personally I'd have no problem 
    with that suggested language, although my opinion isn't what matters. 
    I think this issue was referred back to the GIS subcommittee last 
    week, so I'm forwarding this to them.
    
    Thanks!
    
    - Art
    
    At 5:44 AM -0600 1/18/05, Jeff Kyser wrote:
    >Still seems to me that the following is clearer
    >and more precise (Section 3.3.1):
    >
    >	Latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere and longitudes in the
    >	Western Hemisphere are signed negative with a leading dash.
    >
    >(as opposed to 'Coordinates in the Southern and Western Hemispheres ...')
    >
    >A similar sentence has been added to Section 1.5, it would benefit from
    >the same language.
    >
    >-jeff
    >
    >
    >On Jan 9, 2005, at 10:14 PM, Art Botterell wrote:
    >
    >>Bob -
    >>
    >>Your concern was discussed at some length by both the GIS and 
    >>Messaging Subcommittees.  During the 11/30 call the Messaging 
    >>Subcommittee took up Issue 14 and voted to stick with this 
    >>formulation, which is in line with GIS industry and ISO usage.
    >>
    >>Of course you're welcome to offer an amendment to the full TC for 
    >>discussion on our next call, hopefully with some specific alternate 
    >>language.  After that it'll be up to the Committee.
    >>
    >>- Art
    >>
    >>
    >>At 10:35 PM -0500 1/9/05, Bob Wyman wrote:
    >>>Art Botterell wrote:
    >>>>  The CAP 1.1 spec as approved by the Messaging Subcommittee.  Please
    >>>>  review for approval to move it to public comment ASAP.
    >>>	In the issues list for the CAP specification, it is stated that
    >>>issue 14 would be addressed in 1.1... Yet, the offending and non-sensical
    >>>sentence "Coordinates in the Southern and Western hemispheres are signed
    >>>negative with a leading dash." remains in the specification. As I have been
    >>>saying, since before 1.0 was approved by this working group, "coordinates"
    >>>can't be signed -- only the components of a coordinate can be signed.
    >>>	I suggest that an effort should be made to incorporate committed
    >>>changes to the specification before it is released for public comment.
    >>>
    >>>	bob wyman
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>