OASIS Emergency Management TC

 View Only

RE: [emergency] Circle and Polygon

  • 1.  RE: [emergency] Circle and Polygon

    Posted 06-08-2005 20:35
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [emergency] Circle and Polygon


    Having taken a look at the referenced documents:
    
    1.  By claiming geography, GML claims geometry.   I am 
    curious why you say this is not a mapping application. 
    It appears to be the geometric component which 
    can then be mixed via namespaces with other components, 
    but the primary application is mapping for information 
    management purposes.  It is clearly GIS.  It is not 
    the whole story on geometry.
    
    2.  GML application languages incorporate GML geometry. 
    Are they free to incorporate geometry from other vector 
    formats?
    
    The problem here is that not all elements that are spatio-temporal 
    and application specific are best described by this model.  I 
    recognize the XML means and that is sound.   However, the issues 
    of object-model behavioral fidelity and rendering fidelity are 
    not addressed AFAICT.   Where GML is an excellent basis for 
    GIS, GIS is not the whole story of spatial management because 
    the most important aspects of distributed simulation are not 
    described.
    
    So there is a case to be made for X3D systems that reuse GML 
    information.  I suspect however, there will be clashes in the 
    object model fidelity as rendered into the simulation systems. 
    It seems odd that the OGC works with SVG yet does not work 
    with X3D given that the other important standards (XSBC, 
    XMSF) work with X3D.  What is the story for the use of GML 
    in real-time distributed simulation and visualization of 
    real world objects?
    
    len
    
    
    From: Carl Reed OGC [mailto:creed@opengeospatial.org]
    
    Claude -
    
    GML is not a mapping standard! GML is a standard, grounded in a variety of 
    ISO 19*** series standards, for 
    encoding/expressing/communicating/transporting 
    geographic/location/geospatially enabled content. Now, in terms of 3D, I 
    would strongly encourage you to check out LandGML 
    (http://www.transxml.org/GML+Experiment/Resources/261.aspx and 
    (http://www.opengeospatial.org/initiatives/?iid=133) and CityGML 
    (http://www.ikg.uni-bonn.de/sig3d/docs/Gi4Dm_2005_Kolbe_Groeger.pdf), both 
    application profiles of GML 3.1.
    
    In terms of SVG, there are any number of tools that do GML to SVG for 
    rendering. Some are free, some are for fee.
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]