MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
emergency message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] Re: [emergency-comment] Fwd: CAP Implimentation in CompassLDE
+1
On Aug 6, 2004, at 8:47 AM, Rex Brooks wrote:
> Thanks, Allen,
>
> It looks like the time has come to address this overall issue. I
> uploaded a general presentation on WSS, borrowed from the WSRP TC
> which is one of several areas of concern that all intersect in this
> specific issue of establishing trust networks. In this case the area
> is web services. In line with the various transport-specific
> requirements, we might want to consider gathering requirements for an
> EM-specific registry, especially in the context of developing the
> message-wrapper for setting context(s). A great deal of work has
> already been done in ebXML and UDDI, so we are far from starting from
> a zero point.
>
> I was going to upload the presentations and discussions we have been
> having this week for related issues in security in the WSRP meetings,
> but they have gotten too specific to be valuable in a more general
> context, let alone in narrowing back down to a CAP-specific
> discussion, and we still have one more today. However, it has been
> instructive.
>
> An EM Registry need not be web-only, but could have sections per
> transport mechanism with recommendations for how to organize it to
> list a registrant's organizational capabilities, memberships,
> protocols/standards supported, etc. While that approach might entail
> multiple or repeated entries where an organization spans transports,
> it could be organized in such a way as to make establishing trust
> relationships reliable without having too great an overhead cost.
>
> Regardless, such a registry would need to have the support and
> cooperation of the governmental jurisdictional authorities from the
> local to the international levels, but the movement toward cooperation
> in these areas appears to be favorable, for now at least.
>
> Ciao,
> Rex
>
> At 6:52 AM -0400 8/6/04, R. Allen Wyke wrote:
>> Note that I moved this discussion over to the TC thread and took it
>> off the Public Comment list.
>>
>> Also, please notice that what JD is asking is not "what's possible",
>> but rather "what's official".
>>
>> On Aug 5, 2004, at 8:08 PM, David Aylward wrote:
>>
>>> Claude:
>>>
>>> Yes, but not yet in the best way, integrating the data flow into and
>>> out
>>> of the CAD system. Obviously that requires an interface with the CAD
>>> system, which we are looking forward to doing soon.
>>>
>>> David Aylward
>>> Director
>>> The ComCARE Alliance
>>> 888 17th St., N.W.
>>> Washington, DC 20006
>>> 202-429-0574 Extension 247
>>> 202-296-2962 (fax)
>>>
>>>
>>>