MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
emergency message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] Draft TC Letter on HazCollect
On Jun 13, 2006, at 6/13/06 5:33 PM, Carl Reed OGC Account wrote:
> I am not trying to be overly sticky on the semantics, but if I were
> on the NOAA side, I would ask the question "and what exactly do you
> mean by compliance?"
In reality, however, nobody at NOAA has questioned that. Instead,
they've asked, "non-compliant in what regard?" and we've explained
the problem with their modification of the definition of
<description>, and they've agreed it needs to be fixed. The only
issue has been whether the fix could be deferred.
I'm thinking we might be wise to focus on the question actually on
the table right now and defer conjecture till later. The present
issue is a very simple and pragmatic one and I think all that's
required is a bit of reinforcement of what's already been said.
- Art
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]