OASIS Emergency Management TC

 View Only

RE: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon

  • 1.  RE: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon

    Posted 06-15-2005 21:21
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon


    1.  That suggests that CAP is to be used for NATO C2. 
    It seems highly unlikely but I may be wrong. Even if so 
    see 2.
    
    2.  Having a single global coordinate reference is 
    desirable but cannot be enforced.  Is it better to 
    have the option and it be denoted or to not have 
    an option and have either implementations that do 
    not denote their variance or implementations that 
    cannot use CAP?
    
    It is usually a bad idea to attempt to enforce 
    political will through technical standards.  It 
    creates resistance at every level of decision making. 
    This decision should be made by the stakeholders, so 
    it is a good idea to get many more opinions from those 
    who will be using CAP.
    
    Art says this will remain open to discussion.  It will 
    be wise to post a succinct description to as many of 
    the stakeholders as can be identified and get their 
    consensus.  OTW, this decision for better or worse 
    will appear to have been made by the vendors represented 
    on the WG.  If the stakes are as high as Mr. Danko suggests, 
    then it is worth taking to the users.
    
    len
    
    
    From: David Danko [mailto:DDanko@esri.com]
    
    We agreed early on in CAP to stick to one global coordinate reference
    system to remove all chance of mis-communication. I think this was/is
    the right thing to do. NATO and most military coalitions that need to
    interoperate have settled on this method. There have been many deadly
    mistakes caused by a misunderstanding of CRSs.
    
    If there is a requirement to use different reference systems I suggest
    they be -in addition to - Or - it be very apparent that a non-standard
    CRS is being used. Users should not be able to get to the coordinates
    without knowing what CRS is being used.
    
    Dave
    
    David M. Danko
    GIS Standards
    Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
    8620 Westwood Center Drive
    Vienna, VA 22182-2214
    USA
    E-mail: ddanko@esri.com
    Tel: 703-506-9515 x 8011
    Mobile: 703-989-1863
    Fax: 703-506 9514