Thanks Don,
Odd we didn't catch this considering how many different validators we
worked against, however, it still needs to be fixed.
As long as we are past six months from the last errata, we can do
another errata. I'll check on it.
Cheers,
Rex
McGarry, Donald P. wrote:
>
> All-
>
> I found an error in one of the RM Schemas. In
> EDXL-RMRequestResource.xsd line 21-29 there is the following:
>
>
>
> This differs from all the other schemas that explicitly declare
> Funding as type=”rm:FundingType”.
>
> The problem with this is that child elements of a Funding Section of a
> RequestResource Message will be in the
> urn:oasis:names:tc:emergency:EDXL:RM:1.0:msg instead of the
> urn:oasis:names:tc:emergency:EDXL:RM:1.0.
>
> I have reproduced this validation error in 3 different XML validation
> products (XMLSpy 2010, MSXML 2.0, and Oxygen)[Screenshot attached of
> the first].
>
> It looks as though a special case was trying to be made for this
> particular message for requiring funding information. However, there
> is no way around the namespace collision, and I am unsure why this was
> done any different than the other messages, because Funding is optional.
>
> Proposed change:
>
>