OASIS Emergency Management TC

 View Only

Re: [emergency] Re: [CAP] NOAA Undermining International Standards?

  • 1.  Re: [emergency] Re: [CAP] NOAA Undermining International Standards?

    Posted 06-03-2006 07:46
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [emergency] Re: [CAP] NOAA Undermining International Standards?


    Elysa -
    
    Is it possible we've momentarily lost track of why we set out to  
    forge standards in the first place?
    
    The outcome you describe, in which some users adopt a new standalone  
    system but others don't, while vendors pounce on the new system's  
    shortcomings in an attempt to neutralize what they see as a threat to  
    their own business models... isn't that exactly how our current  
    patchwork of incompatible, uncoordinated systems got built?
    
    HazCollect could be a success for America... a nationwide system that  
    adds value rather than detracting from allied governmental and  
    commercial offerings... just the sort of national warning framework  
    we of the Partnership for Public Warning called for a few short years  
    ago.  But a number of the folks who actually have experience and a  
    stake in warning systems see serious problems with the way it's being  
    deployed.  Even the NOAA manager himself acknowledges a shortcoming  
    that needs to be fixed.
    
    What I'm suggesting for the TC is nothing other than what Lee  
    recommends and Tom endorses... that we state, forthrightly and  
    factually, our concern about the incomplete way CAP is being  
    implemented in HazCollect... not as opposition to the HazCollect  
    program, but as a strong caution against deferring action on a well- 
    known problem that risks serious ramifications.
    
    - Art
    
    PS - To those who cling to a fond faith that NOAA will eventually do  
    the right thing if we just wait long enough, all I can do is keep  
    asking "But what if they don't?"  Wishing alone won't make it so, and  
    Herb's most sincere intentions still don't constitute a guarantee.   
    The harsh reality is that once HazCollect deploys there'll be less  
    incentive for NOAA to make changes, not more.  And as discussed  
    earlier, there's more at stake here than just HazCollect's success or  
    failure.
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]