OASIS Emergency Management TC

 View Only

RE: [emergency] FW: Suggestion: Add incidentKeyword to contentObject

  • 1.  RE: [emergency] FW: Suggestion: Add incidentKeyword to contentObject

    Posted 01-31-2006 13:21
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [emergency] FW: Suggestion: Add incidentKeyword to contentObject


    I would agree with Renato, except that I know of no operational
    implementations of the DE, other than the WAY previous and much
    different implementation (2 years ago) that ComCARE implemented and DMIS
    (and others) prototyped.  Those changes were the basis for what we
    previously had out for comment so the "substantive change does not
    apply. In the meantime, there are LOTS of implementations (including
    ours) that have been put on hold waiting for a completed voting draft to
    come out that can be used in an operation prototype.  The pent up
    frustration is getting pretty serious.  Perfection IS the enemy of good
    enough.  
    
    Respectfully, 
    
    
    Gary A. Ham 
    Senior Research Scientist
    Battelle Memorial Institute
    540-288-5611 (office)
    703-869-6241 (cell)
    "You would be surprised what you can accomplish when you do not care who
    gets the credit." - Harry S. Truman
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Renato Iannella [mailto:renato@nicta.com.au] 
    Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 6:45 PM
    To: Elysa Jones; Emergency_Mgt_TC TC
    Cc: Rex Brooks; Tim Grapes
    Subject: Re: [emergency] FW: Suggestion: Add incidentKeyword to
    contentObject
    
    
    
    On 31 Jan 2006, at 04:05, Elysa Jones wrote:
    
    > I don't think anyone on the TC is interested in going back for a 60- 
    > day review at this point in the EDXL-DE.  If anyone feels strongly the
    
    > other way with respect to this change, please let me know.
    
    Not that I feel strongly about it, but we should be aware that the OASIS
    TC process defines "Substantive Change" as:
    
       "a change to a specification that would require a compliant
    application or
        implementation to be modified or rewritten in order to remain
    compliant."
    
    This is undoubtedly the case for the current version of EDXL-DE.
    
    
    Cheers...  Renato Iannella
    National ICT Australia (NICTA)
    
    
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    --
    This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain
    legally privileged information or copyright material. You should not
    read, copy, use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not
    an intended recipient, please contact us at once by return email and
    then delete both messages. We do not accept liability in connection with
    computer virus, data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised
    access or unauthorised amendment. This notice should not be removed.
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
    OASIS
    at:
    https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]