OASIS Emergency Management TC

 View Only
Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

EDXL HAVE and NIEM 2.1 dictionary =?UTF-8?Q?alignment=3F?=

  • 1.  EDXL HAVE and NIEM 2.1 dictionary =?UTF-8?Q?alignment=3F?=

    Posted 07-12-2009 04:46
      |   view attached

    Attachment(s)

    xml
    HospitalStatus-xref-wantlist.xml   3 KB 1 version


  • 2.  RE: [emergency] EDXL HAVE and NIEM 2.1 dictionary alignment?

    Posted 07-12-2009 14:29 
    










    


    They are not – we have added in HAVE entities to the em domain and
we also created an “adapter” to point to the actual OASIS standard.  This si
being done so we can create a mirror IEPD of HAVE that has a one-to-one match…the
idea is to create an XSLT that translates between the HAVE IEPD and the “real”
standard that can be carried in the digest of a SOAP message….  
    


    


    


    Thanks,
    


    Lee
    


     
    


    "I was wondering why that Frisbee was getting bigger - then
it hit me."
    


    


    


    


    


    From: David RR Webber
(XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info]
    
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 12:46 AM
    
To: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org
    
Subject: [emergency] EDXL HAVE and NIEM 2.1 dictionary alignment?
    
Importance: High
    


    


    


    


    


    


    Team,
    


    


    


    I've
finally managed to crack the wantlist.xml processing against the online GTRI
SSGT and NIEM 2.0 dictionary working for the HospitalStatus schema and using
CAM compare to dictionary tool to reverse engineer the wantlist from the
schema.
    


    


    http://niem.gtri.gatech.edu/niemtools/ssgt/SSGT-Generate.iepd#
    


    


    I've
attached the sample wantlist.xml if you want to try this yourselves (click on
the "Options" - far top right -  and then you will see a select
file and load buttons).
    


    


    Now -
when reviewing this - you will notice a raft of gml elements are missing (only
a short list are there) - PLUS - there are many missing em: items.
    


    


    So the
key questions is - are these all missing ones now added into the new NIEM 2.1
dictionary release that is scheduled for September?
    


    


    If not
someone needs to contact GTRI very quickly this week - to make sure these will
be added.
    


    


    And if we
could get a beta test of the Access database of the new NIEM 2.1 then would be
best so we can crosscheck it all.
    


    


    Thanks,
DW


Related Content