OASIS Emergency Management TC

 View Only

Re: [emergency] Fwd: OASIS EM TC Category for EDXL standards

  • 1.  Re: [emergency] Fwd: OASIS EM TC Category for EDXL standards

    Posted 09-20-2005 14:58
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [emergency] Fwd: OASIS EM TC Category for EDXL standards


    I think Art's suggestion is very good.
    
    Rex
    
    At 10:32 AM -0400 9/20/05, Art Botterell wrote:
    >Might the promulgation and ongoing maintenance of a recommended 
    >standards profile fall within the scope of NIEM?  Could the grant 
    >language simply reference such a listing?
    >
    >- Art
    >
    >
    >On Sep 19, 2005, at 6:44 AM, Elysa Jones wrote:
    >
    >>Art and others,
    >>I met last week with the DM program and the EIC and we discussed 
    >>this topic.  There is guidance in the works for grant programs as 
    >>well for other federal agencies to use.  The particular draft that 
    >>was circulated to the TC members was very preliminary.  All agreed 
    >>that making EIC membership a requirement and forcing DMIS was not 
    >>in the best interest of anyone.  The main reason for Bill Kalin 
    >>sending the message was to ask if we or someone at OASIS had run 
    >>into this naming issue before.  That is, a way to reference several 
    >>standards all in the same discipline but on different upgrade and 
    >>development paths.  He was particularly interested in getting some 
    >>wording from us that would reference the work being done now 
    >>including versions to follow as well as additional EDXL emerging 
    >>standards.  They seem to want to avoid listing each separately and 
    >>are concerned about versions getting out of date.  Any suggestions?
    >>Elysa Jones, Chair
    >>OASIS EM-TC
    >>Engineering Program Manager
    >>Warning Systems, Inc.
    >>256-880-8702 x102
    >>
    >>At 05:19 PM 9/18/2005, Art Botterell wrote:
    >>
    >>>This strikes me as the wrong way to do the right thing.  Certainly
    >>>there should be grant guidance language that promotes the use of open
    >>>standards and even perhaps particular ones.
    >>>
    >>>But this has the regrettable appearance of an attempt to carve out
    >>>some bureaucratic turf for EIC and the DM program, by designating
    >>>them as the sole legitimate source of such standards... even before
    >>>those standards are identified, evaluated or even created.
    >>>
    >>>I would think that an eclectic profile of recommended standards,
    >>>drawing from all the available sources and updated from time to time
    >>>as new standards are formalized and old ones are updated, would be
    >>>much more in the inclusive spirit of NEIM.
    >>>
    >>>And from a more tactical point of view, I think it could actually be
    >>>damaging to the current positive reception and uptake of CAP within
    >>>its target domain (alerting and warning) to complicate things by
    >>>confusing it with the much broader, and as yet much less mature, EDXL
    >>>program.
    >>>
    >>>For some time now our workplan has been to continue to promote and
    >>>develop CAP separately while EDXL develops and mature, and then to
    >>>create a fully EDXL-compliant version at CAP 2.0.
    >>>
    >>>I don't believe OASIS or the TC ought to change that approach for
    >>>what appear to be merely bureaucratic reasons.  Funding guidance
    >>>language certainly could be written to include CAP and EDXL
    >>>specifically without conflating the two prematurely or preemptively
    >>>excluding other potential sources of valuable standards.
    >>>
    >>>Aside from being bad practice technically, I don't think OASIS and
    >>>this TC want to get embroiled in external jurisdictional issues...
    >>>especially not at a time where the whole current structure of
    >>>emergency management is undergoing so much scrutiny at the highest
    >>>policy levels.
    >>>
    >>>- Art
    >>>
    >>>On Sep 12, 2005, at 9/12/05 3:25 PM, Elysa Jones wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>TC Members,  I received the following email from Bill Kalin
    >>>>representing the DHS/DM program.  There is specific grant guidance
    >>>>language proposed for our review.  I would prefer discussion begin
    >>>>on the list and then we can take it up at the next regular TC call
    >>>>9/20.  Elysa
    >>>>
    >>>>>From: "Kalin, Bill" <Bill.Kalin@associates.dhs.gov>
    >>>>>To: "'ejones@warningsystems.com'" <ejones@warningsystems.com>
    >>>>>Cc: Matt Walton <mwalton3@gmail.com>, "Hines, Chip"
    >>>>><Chip.Hines@dhs.gov>,
    >>>>>         "Baker, Ashley" <Ashley.Baker@associates.dhs.gov>,
    >>>>>         "McIntyre, Robert" <Robert.Mcintyre@associates.dhs.gov>,
    >>>>>         "Wood, Mark" <Mark.Wood@associates.dhs.gov>
    >>>>>Subject: OASIS EM TC Category for EDXL standards
    >>>>>Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:11:51 -0400
    >>>>>
    >>>>>Elysa - We have been asked by the Office of Management and Budget
    >>>>>(OMB) to create standardized RFI/RFP language that federal
    >>>>>agencies would required to use when seeking to purchase an
    >>>>>incident management software application.  We want to be able to
    >>>>>refer to EDXL as a single set of standards as opposed to listing
    >>>>>them all individually, including CAP.  This is the first step in
    >>>>>creating common grant guidance language that will be required when
    >>>>>local, tribal and state governments are seeking to purchase
    >>>>>incident management tools with DHS grant money.  We believe this
    >>>>>will strongly facilitate the adoption of standards within the
    >>>>>vendor community and further develop this emerging market.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>What can be done via OASIS to help create this single type of
    >>>>>category under the OASIS TC?  I am attaching a draft of proposed
    >>>>>language for the RFI/RFP's which includes a desired reference to
    >>>>>the OASIS web site.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>Bill Kalin
    >>>>>Disaster Management eGov Initiative
    >>>>>Office of the Chief Information Officer
    >>>>>Emergency Preparedness and Response/FEMA
    >>>>>Department of Homeland Security
    >>>>>(202) 646-4347
    >>>>>bill.kalin@associates.dhs.gov
    >>>>>
    >>>><Purchase_Guidance_DM.doc>
    >>>>
    >>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    >>>>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs
    >>>>in OASIS
    >>>>at:
    >>>>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    >>>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
    >>>at:
    >>>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    >>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
    >>at:
    >>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
    >>
    >
    >
    >---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    >generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
    >at:
    >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
    
    
    -- 
    Rex Brooks
    President, CEO
    Starbourne Communications Design
    GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
    Berkeley, CA 94702
    Tel: 510-849-2309
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]