MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















emergency message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon




From: "Carl Reed OGC" <creed@opengeospatial.org>
To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@intergraph.com>,  "'Art Botterell'" <acb@incident.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:54:39 -0600






Yes, this is one easy way to deal with the issue. Many OGC interface specs 
have an optional parameter/flag (whatever you wish to call it) that allows 
optional/and-or vendor specific extensions to an interface/payload to meet 
specific requirements. If done correctly, then can be properly be validated 
and communicated. Also, in terms of ISO definitions for profiles and 
application schemas - if done correctly - what we end up having is/are CAP 
application schemas. This is very normal best practice in IT when dealing 
with XML based standards. Hope this is not too cryptic :-)

Cheers

Carl