MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
emergency message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [emergency] Draft Reply To PPW Letter
Allen -
Even by your own logic... having admitted that the TC has yet to
address what you call the "how" issue, how can you possibly claim
that the TC believes one approach is "more friendly" than another?
(And what does "more friendly" mean, anyway?) It seems like we're
getting way ahead of ourselves here.
More fundamentally, why send this letter at all? Especially to a
large membership organization like PPW, where it can be expected to
have the practical effect of a public statement? We're under no
obligation to reply to the PPW letter at any particular time, or
ever. And we're certainly not required to do so in a way that would
preempt or prejudice the TC's deliberations.
- Art
PS - Just a detail... but if I remember correctly, the TC adopted the
current Committee Specification (as it was called at the time) not at
the 7/15 meeting but a month later on the 8/12 conference call.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]