OASIS Emergency Management TC

 View Only

RE: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon

  • 1.  RE: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon

    Posted 06-16-2005 13:44
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon


    Automated emergency systems that 'forget' that 
    there is a different geo-referencing system in 
    use by an allied system?  It's hard to make 
    a computer forget; it's easy to make it not notice.
    
    Software is more likely to not notice a data error 
    if its designers assume one system holds for all 
    applications rather than building in validation checks.
    
    "Without the spatial reference system pointer, we will not be able
    to work across jurisdictional boundaries who use different coordinate 
    systems, or with many legacy data sources."
    
    Interoperability is a transient state of information 
    ecosystems.  Reliable partners manage transitions 
    equitably.
    
    len
    
    
    From: Ham, Gary A [mailto:hamg@BATTELLE.ORG]
    
    I can state for the record that he military is at least expiimenting
    with CAP.  It is part of several ongoing trials in this year's Coalition
    Waarefare Interoperability Demonstration (CWID) going on this very week.
    
    
    From: David Danko [mailto:DDanko@esri.com] 
    
    I didn't mean to imply that NATO C2 would be using CAP. I just meant
    that the military - having probably the most experience passing
    coordinates around - has learned that using one CRS works the best for
    passing coordinates. Although developed by the military - it's heavily
    used outside the military. The International Civil Aviation Organization
    (ICAO) has settled on WGS 84 for air navigation systems see
    www.WGS84.com and it's the CRS used by GPS.
    http://everything2.com/index.pl?node=WGS%2084
    
    I have seen it happen many times where people "forgot" or didn't realize
    their information was in a different reference system. I was just
    looking at this as a communication issue. In an emergency situation one
    may not have the time to realize there is a miscommunication and go back
    and fix it.
    
    I agree we need to get the opinions of users - we should also include
    some geodesist. I certainly don't know all the uses for CAP. It may very
    well be used for high precision positioning where a local system may
    work the best - we'll have to see what the users want.
    
    Dave
     
    
    David M. Danko
    GIS Standards
    Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc.
    8620 Westwood Center Drive
    Vienna, VA 22182-2214
    USA
    E-mail: ddanko@esri.com
    Tel: 703-506-9515 x 8011
    Mobile: 703-989-1863
    Fax: 703-506 9514