OASIS Emergency Management TC

 View Only

RE: [emergency] RE: Sensors and sensor standards - clarification please

  • 1.  RE: [emergency] RE: Sensors and sensor standards - clarification please

    Posted 03-21-2006 21:15
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    emergency message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: RE: [emergency] RE: Sensors and sensor standards - clarification please


    Thanks!
    
    Carl
    
    > Carl,
    > You are correct. The IF SC also has the task of looking for any other
    > sensor standards work to identify gaps or overlaps. When that is done we
    > will make use of all the good work done to ensure the EDXL payload for
    > sensors is understandable.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Tom Merkle
    >
    > CapWIN:        www.capwin.org <http://www.capwin.org/>
    > Phone:          (301) 614-3720
    > Cell Phone:   (240) 375-1966
    > Fax:               (301) 614-0581
    > e-mail:           tmerkle@capwin.org <mailto:tmerkle@capwin.org>
    >
    > CapWIN
    > 6305 Ivy Lane Suite 300
    > Capital Office Park
    > Greenbelt, MD 20770
    >
    >
    >   _____
    >
    > From: Carl Reed OGC Account [mailto:creed@opengeospatial.org]
    > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 12:20 PM
    > To: emergency@lists.oasis-open.org
    > Subject: [emergency] RE: Sensors and sensor standards - clarification
    > please
    >
    >
    > Hi -
    >
    > Sorry, but I need some help understanding the semantics of the use in
    > this TC of the term "sensor standards". IEEE 1451 has developed and
    > approved a class of sensor standards. ISO TC 204 is defining and seeking
    > approval of a set of abstract sensor interface and encoding standards
    > for telematics (in car sensor systems), and the OGC is defining and
    > approving a set of interface and encoding standards for discovery,
    > access, description, and tasking of sensors.
    >
    > I do not think that the EM TC is looking to develop this class of
    > standards. I think what we are talking about are how to express
    > information as part of an EDXL payload about a sensor or a sensor
    > observation that has been provided by one of the standards mentioned
    > above.
    >
    > Am I correct?
    >
    > Thanks for the help!
    >
    > Carl Reed, PhD
    > CTO and Executive Director Specification Program
    > OGC
    >
    > The OGC: Helping the World to Communicate Geographically
    >
    > ---------------------
    >
    > This communication, including attachments, is for the exclusive use of
    > addressee and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged
    > information. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, copying,
    > disclosure, dissemination or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you
    > are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender  immediately by
    > return email and delete this communication and destroy all copies.
    >
    > "The important thing is not to stop questioning." -- Albert Einstein
    >
    >
    
    
    


    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]