MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















emergency message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [emergency] CAP Visualization (was RE: CAP Developers' Forum...)




From: Jeff Kyser <ktrails@comcast.net>
To: "Speede, Kwasi" <Kwasi.Speede@associates.dhs.gov>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 19:12:48 -0500






Hey Kwasi,

Since <event> is a required field (of an <info>) but is
free text, and <eventCode> is optional and
system-specific, we're not left with much if we want
to filter messages based on event, are we?

oh well.

-jeff

On Wednesday, May 19, 2004, at 05:45  PM, Speede, Kwasi wrote:

> Jeff,
>
> Yes, we "fell back" on processing against system-specific <eventCode>  
> values
> in the broker. <Event> was not appropriate for our purposes because  
> multiple
> instances cannot be defined for a single message scenario.
>
> I am curious about the different approaches that are evolving or being
> proposed for determining who are the authorized CAP message originators
> across various implementation communities and how developers are  
> intending
> to authenticate their messages when processing CAP. This topic would  
> be a
> great addition for the implementers guide!
>
> Thanks all,
>
> Kwasi
>
>