MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
emergency message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: [emergency] Re: [emergency-comment] Fwd: CAP Implimentation inCompassLDE
Thanks, Allen,
It looks like the time has come to address this overall issue. I
uploaded a general presentation on WSS, borrowed from the WSRP TC
which is one of several areas of concern that all intersect in this
specific issue of establishing trust networks. In this case the area
is web services. In line with the various transport-specific
requirements, we might want to consider gathering requirements for an
EM-specific registry, especially in the context of developing the
message-wrapper for setting context(s). A great deal of work has
already been done in ebXML and UDDI, so we are far from starting from
a zero point.
I was going to upload the presentations and discussions we have been
having this week for related issues in security in the WSRP meetings,
but they have gotten too specific to be valuable in a more general
context, let alone in narrowing back down to a CAP-specific
discussion, and we still have one more today. However, it has been
instructive.
An EM Registry need not be web-only, but could have sections per
transport mechanism with recommendations for how to organize it to
list a registrant's organizational capabilities, memberships,
protocols/standards supported, etc. While that approach might entail
multiple or repeated entries where an organization spans transports,
it could be organized in such a way as to make establishing trust
relationships reliable without having too great an overhead cost.
Regardless, such a registry would need to have the support and
cooperation of the governmental jurisdictional authorities from the
local to the international levels, but the movement toward
cooperation in these areas appears to be favorable, for now at least.
Ciao,
Rex
At 6:52 AM -0400 8/6/04, R. Allen Wyke wrote:
>Note that I moved this discussion over to the TC thread and took it
>off the Public Comment list.
>
>Also, please notice that what JD is asking is not "what's possible",
>but rather "what's official".
>
>On Aug 5, 2004, at 8:08 PM, David Aylward wrote:
>
>>Claude:
>>
>>Yes, but not yet in the best way, integrating the data flow into and out
>>of the CAD system. Obviously that requires an interface with the CAD
>>system, which we are looking forward to doing soon.
>>
>>David Aylward
>>Director
>>The ComCARE Alliance
>>888 17th St., N.W.
>>Washington, DC 20006
>>202-429-0574 Extension 247
>>202-296-2962 (fax)
>>
>>
>>