MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
emergency message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: [emergency] Circle and Polygon
Me too!
Since my folks like the current structure just fine, if it meets the OGC
standard, or can be adjusted slightly to do so, I am 100% on board.
My only point was that with Dr. Ianella's comment and the GJXDM pointing
otherwise we need firm standing for what we actually choose. But I also
agree with Art's point that excess tags are excess tags and, when there
is complete agreement on the meaning of strings inside, the extra
"taggage" may not provide sufficient value.
R/s
Gary A. Ham
Senior Research Scientist
Battelle Memorial Institute
540-288-5611 (office)
703-869-6241 (cell)
"You would be surprised what you can accomplish when you do not care who
gets the credit." - Harry S. Truman
-----Original Message-----
From: Art Botterell [mailto:acb@incident.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 10:52 AM
To: Emergency_Mgt_TC TC
Subject: Re: [emergency] Circle and Polygon
On Jun 8, 2005, at 6/8/05 7:33 AM, Carl Reed OGC wrote:
> That said, I would like to have the GML gurus in the OGC take a
> look at the circle/polygon constructs in EDXL and provide feedback.
That would be great, Carl. The circle construct, in particular, was
a bit of anticipation of something GML 3 was planning on at the
time... it would be good to make sure we're still on the same page.
- Art
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]