Technical Advisory Board (TAB)

There is an orphaned section at the end of the document that says: 1        Checklist NOTE: the remaining check points below are more relevant to normative content than C.C. Are you using the right keywords from RFC 2119, and   in uppercase? If you are using ISO keywords, have you explicitly stated this in the specification? Is each normative statement related to a conformance target(s)? X-NONE X-NONE I suggest we move the 3 points it makes and add them to the Normative Content section or 10 Rules -- All the best, Ashok

Never mind.  I was integrate the 3 points into the main body of the document All the best, Ashok On 8/1/2014 11:41 AM, Ashok Malhotra wrote: There is an orphaned section at the end of the document that says: 1        Checklist NOTE: the remaining check points below are more relevant to normative content than C.C. Are you using the right keywords from RFC 2119, and   in uppercase? If you are using ISO keywords, have you explicitly stated this in the specification? Is each normative statement related to a conformance target(s)? X-NONE X-NONE I suggest we move the 3 points it makes and add them to the Normative Content section or 10 Rules -- All the best, Ashok

Ashok:   Sounds good – yes we don’t need a separate “checklist” section.   On another note: about how to more clearly contrast the “sample material” from the guideline text: what I had seen done in WS-I profiles is use of shading: (menu bar: home à paragraph à borders and shading) then the reader can spot sample material immediately in a page – easier to jump from one to the other.   Cheers, -jacques     From: tab@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:tab@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Ashok Malhotra Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 10:22 AM To: tab@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [tab] Re: Conformance Clauses   Never mind.  I was integrate the 3 points into the main body of the document All the best, Ashok On 8/1/2014 11:41 AM, Ashok Malhotra wrote: There is an orphaned section at the end of the document that says: 1       1        Checklist NOTE: the remaining check points below are more relevant to normative content than C.C. Are you using the right keywords from RFC 2119, and  in uppercase? If you are using ISO keywords, have you explicitly stated this in the specification? Is each normative statement related to a conformance target(s)? I suggest we move the 3 points it makes and add them to the Normative Content section or 10 Rules -- All the best, Ashok  

On 8/8/2014 3:55 PM, Jacques Durand wrote: On another note: about how to more clearly contrast the “sample material” from the guideline text: what I had seen done in WS-I profiles is use of shading: (menu bar: home à paragraph à borders and shading) then the reader can spot sample material immediately in a page – easier to jump from one to the other. Jacques, I put background colors on quoted material and also on our recommended material. Please take a look at the attached. I removed all the change markings but there are a couple of comments/questions remaining. Ashok Attachment: tab-conformance-clauses-v1 0-consolidated-rev12.docx Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document