MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] EFiling Process Models Subcommittee




From: Allen Jensen <ajensen@occourts.org>
To: drdaniels@bearingpoint.net, Tom.Clarke@courts.wa.gov,jmessing@law-on-line.com, Donald.Bergeron@lexisnexis.com,legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 08:45:03 -0800






We're using SOAP/MSMQ/COM+ for transmission and reliability from the
EFSP server at the EFP to our EFM servers only.  Then it would be a
local communication from the EFM to the CMS/DMS systems.  


Allen Jensen
Orange County Superior Court
Internet Development / EFiling
949.472.6946



>>> <Tom.Clarke@courts.wa.gov> 12/27/02 08:29AM >>>
John,

I can't resist responding as a member of Legal XML, rather than OXCI. 
Are
you suggesting that we use SOAP to transact directly from the EFSP to
the
CMS without using an EFM at all to mediate the transactions?  If so,
that is
certainly a major departure from the architectural concepts that Legal
XML
has followed in the past (or at least my understanding of them).  Just
checking, since I am certainly open to consideration of all
possibilities.

I believe OXCI would like to mirror as closely as possible the
proposed
Legal XML architecture for Version 2.0 (Blue) of the standards, when
it
exists, without making any more architectural decisions than would be
appropriate for an implementer of standards (rather than a setter of
them).
I would love to see the business process subcommittee of Legal XML get
out
ahead of the OXCI project, since the required business models drive
implementation decisions almost as much as they drive standards
requirements.  To the extent that implementers get out ahead of the
standards, commercial vendors will be in a much better position to
evolve
their EFM offerings (to remain in compliance) as the Legal XML
standards
mature.