MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Court Filing Comments




From: "John M. Greacen" <john@greacen.net>
To: "'Dallas Powell'" <dpowell@tybera.com>,<Shane.Durham@lexisnexis.com>,<legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:35:01 -0600














The project completion plan includes the
development of sample instances of the schemas.













From: Dallas Powell
[mailto:dpowell@tybera.com]

Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005
1:05 PM

To: Shane.Durham@lexisnexis.com;
legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org

Subject: Re:
[legalxml-courtfiling] Court Filing Comments







I agree with Shane that without some several XML test
samples it will be difficult to effectively determine if the standard is
adequate.  In addition, it is not until you get to the exceptions that you
really begin to seek the weaknesses.  The challenge is finding the time to
map all the possible variations into samples.





 













----- Original Message ----- 





From: Shane.Durham@lexisnexis.com






To: legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org






Sent: Monday, September
26, 2005 3:38 PM





Subject:
[legalxml-courtfiling] Court Filing Comments









I have attached a document with
my comments.

 

I have focused my efforts
on QueryMDE, timestamps, and person/org relationships.

I was trying to hit the big conceptual
issues.. I didn't get to all of them.

Maybe someone else will hit what I
missed.

 

And,  I hope, later on, there will
continue to be time to fuss over smaller details.

 

I included a comment at the end of my
document urging us to take the time to develop some XML samples that
will help us to illustrate how the spec is intended to work.. or where the spec
is deficient.  I don't see how our reviews of the spec can be very
effective without some concrete examples.

 

I look forward to the discussions,

- Shane Durham

LexisNexis

 









From:
Shane.Durham@lexisnexis.com [mailto:Shane.Durham@lexisnexis.com]

Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005
1:47 PM

To:
legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org

Subject: RE:
[legalxml-courtfiling] September 25th deadline

I have been reviewing the specs today,
and have assembled some comments.

 

I will be submitting the final version
of these comments tomorrow, on 9/26 ( this is one day later than John
asked.)  This gives me a little more time to review/edit my thoughts and
to review more of the specs.

 

I hope this request for a minor
extension will be acceptable to the group.

 

- Shane Durham

LexisNexis

 

 

 









From: John M.
Greacen [mailto:john@greacen.net]

Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005
6:27 PM

To: Electronic Court Filing
Technical Committeee

Subject: [legalxml-courtfiling]
September 25th deadline

In accordance with the schedule that I just posted, the
deadline for comments on the domain models, GJXDM element mappings, and schemas
(including case query and definitions if they are posted by the end of the
coming week) is September 25th.



Failure to make a comment or to state an objection during the comment
period constitutes your agreement that you can live with the particular
artifact as is.





John
M. Greacen

Greacen
Associates, LLC

HCR 



505-289-2164

505-289-2163
(fax)

505-780-1450
(cell)











---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that

generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS

at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

















References:

Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Court Filing Comments
From: "Dallas Powell" <dpowell@tybera.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]