UBL Small Business SC

 View Only

Re: [ubl-sbsc] UBP 2.0 definitions needing CPA templates

  • 1.  Re: [ubl-sbsc] UBP 2.0 definitions needing CPA templates

    Posted 03-07-2006 11:47
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    ubl-sbsc message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


    Subject: Re: [ubl-sbsc] UBP 2.0 definitions needing CPA templates


    Sacha , cc SBSC and Monica due to discussion below
    
    Hi Sacha, This is where the time differences between UK and US come in handy:
    I do apologise but I only just realised you were generating CPAs for the generic
    definitions too so we'll need them for the attached too as well as the
    one I sent earlier.
    Sorry.
    
    
    I wonder what the implications of having CPAs for the generic
    definitions will be.
    Is there a way to use the generic definition unchanged? Normally it would be
    included into another to specialize it with attribute substitution
    (I'd like to see
    a demo of that as I'm not yet sure how it would work) for a particular schema
    (typically other than UBL, though it could be another, say future,
    version of UBL
    or a customisation perhaps). What would happen if they were left as they are and
    referenced in the CPAs as they are? On the other hand I appreciate the benefit
    of illustrating a CPA referencing the generic definition as this may minimise
    changes when the definition is specialized and needs to be referenced. But if
    the CPA references the generic definition does that actually prove
    useful in some
    way? Can a CPA be that generic?
    
    Any comments welcome :-)
    
    All the best
    
    Steve
    

    ebxmlbp-2.0_generic-attached-document-notification-1.zip



    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]