MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl-sbsc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Fwd: Codelist support for UBL SBS and UBL SBS XPath questions (Sacha)
Sacha presents some interesting ideas for SBSC:
should we seek to help small businesses by adding
further code-related artifacts, e.g. to the SBS?
I'm forwarding this from Sacha due to problems he
has had (temporarily I hope) with posting.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Stephen Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
Date: 02-Mar-2006 13:39
Subject: Re: Codelist support for UBL SBS and UBL SBS XPath questions (Sacha)
To: sschlegel@cyclonecommerce.com
Hi Sacha
Apologies that I'll have to answer part today and part tomorrow
(pressed for time).
> Code List questions:
>
> o Will there be a codelist package for UBL-2 SBS or will the same
> codelists be used for UBL-2 SBS?
> o In case there will be a specific one for UBL SBS, do you intend to
> strip the codelists for SBS (eg remove codes that will not likely be
> used by a Small Business)? Or would this go against a concept of code
> lists?
Thanks very much for this. I think these should definitely be in our
plan. I hadn't thought of subsets to the codelists but I think an SBS
codelist definition file is a great idea to consider.
All the best
Steve
On 02/03/06, Stephen Green <stephen_green@bristol-city.gov.uk> wrote:
> forwarded from bcc
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sacha Schlegel <sschlegel@cyclonecommerce.com>
> To: Stephen Green <BRITSDG@bristol-city.gov.uk>
> Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 04:21:02 -0700
> Subject: Codelist support for UBL SBS and UBL SBS XPath questions
> Hi Steve
>
> I just read the UBL-2 UBL-2-codelist-support-0.1.zip support file
> package. Very cool. Thanks very much to G. Ken Holman and Anthony B.
> Coates.
>
> Code List questions:
>
> o Will there be a codelist package for UBL-2 SBS or will the same
> codelists be used for UBL-2 SBS?
> o In case there will be a specific one for UBL SBS, do you intend to
> strip the codelists for SBS (eg remove codes that will not likely be
> used by a Small Business)? Or would this go against a concept of code
> lists?
>
> o When I was looking at the genericode instances I saw some (eg the
> InvoiceTypeCodeType.gc) are still empty. Are they still empty because
> they are currently populated (version 0.3 would indicate that it is work
> in progress)?
>
> UBL SBS XPath questions:
>
> Question 1)
>
> Regarding the Invoice-XPath.txt file:
>
> 15 indicates that there must be a CreditorSupplierParty element
> 18 indicates that there must not be a Party element
> 20 indicates that there must be a Name element
>
> In the XML schema Name is a child element of Party which is a child
> element of CreditorSupplierParty
>
> actual question:
>
> o Does 20 indicate that there must be a Name element only if there is a
> Party element
> o If true could this result in an empty but valid CreditorSupplierParty
> element?
>
> Question 2)
>
> o What is the reason to have omitted the datatypes in the XPath.txt (eg
> Invoice-XPath.txt) files? Wouldn't that be another valuable information
> item maybe as a forth column? I assume there are reason the datatype
> information is not present in the XPath text file.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Sacha Schlegel
>
>
>
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]