MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
ubl-sbsc message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-sbsc] Revised candidate XPath files for SBS
>> <XPath xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:schema:XPath-1.0"
>> id="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:xpath:DespatchAdvice-1.0:sbs-1.0"
>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>> xsi:schemaLocation="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:schema:XPath-1.0 xpath.xsd">
>>
>> in the top level element, associating the instance with the schema.
> I'm not in favour of doing this ... the schema tools I use do validation
> without the presence of this, and I'm of the opinion that validation is
> something you do outside the instance, not inside the instance.
..
> So, I can change them, but I don't think we should. What are the arguments
> for including this change?
. . . . . . . . Ken
Ken,
Greetings
I asked about this in the Atlantic TC call. Mavis of the NDR team was
present and could see nothing wrong with how we have it now
and no-one else either objected to keeping the 'schemaLocation' details
out of the instances since schema validation of these 'schema-like'
XPaths-instances would likely be a rare exception (in cases where
it is required there would likely be sufficient skill to still validate
without the 'schemaLocation' attribute within the instance).
So I agree too that we are OK leaving them out. Apologies for
delaying things with this issue but I guess it's as well to get these
things commented on internally before a more public review.
In this case then I guess we might soon be ready, after some
further changes (my action item) to index.html, for voting on this
as a submission to the TC.
Very many thanks
All the best
Steve
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]