MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl-tsc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl-tsc] COO data model




From: Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
To: "Jern Kuan, Leong" <jernkuan@crimsonlogic.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:02:33 +0800










i think i see what you mean.  in fact, we have Item. Manufacturer_
Party to indicate who made the goods.  I suspect this is what we meant,
so we dont need Production Party at all.



Jern Kuan, Leong wrote:


  
  
  
Hi All,
  
 
  
I have some doubts on having the production party at the
Certificate Of Origin Application level. I would think that it would be
more logical to have it at the consignment instead.
  
 
  
Another question is is the type for Additional Information
correct under the Common Library:Item? It is currently Identifier.
  
 
  
Rgds and thanxs
  
Jernkuan


-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160

DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business Informatics and Web Services
http://www.docengineering.com/









References:

COO data model
From: "Jern Kuan, Leong" <jernkuan@crimsonlogic.com>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]