OASIS Code List Representation TC

 View Only
  • 1.  Revision to the CVA specification

    Posted 11-12-2008 14:49
    Fellow CLRTC members,
    
    While the Code List Representation Technical Committee list has been 
    quiet, there have been a growing number of users of OASIS genericode 
    and the proposed Context/Value Association document model.  I've been 
    working with people in New Zealand, England and Belgium on new 
    implementations, as well as assisting the UBL committee with their 
    2.0 update release with updated files.  I also had the opportunity to 
    teach a full day on genericode and CVA in Rome in April.
    
    Further to Maarten's formal request:
    
       http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/codelist-comment/200811/msg00000.html
    
    ... I have addressed a couple of small issues that have been piling up:
    
      - augmented the Identification section to be more in line with genericode
      - rearranged and augmented the Annotation section to be more in line with
        genericode
      - added the mark="" attribute to characterize a context with a name token
    
    Maarten's request was framed using Schematron, yet CVA is specified 
    to be implementation independent.  The new CVA mark="" attribute can 
    be implemented with flag="" when using Schematron as the 
    implementation.  Using "mark" reflects that the user is marking the 
    particular context with some abstract characteristic that may be 
    useful in downstream distinctions of the constraint violations.
    
    Still not addressed are valuable comments from Tony regarding the 
    prose used in the draft specification.  I'm waiting until we stop 
    getting technical comments before reworking the prose.
    
      The specification of CVA:
    
       http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=29990
    
      An example Schematron implementation of CVA for validation:
    
       http://www.cranesoftwrights.com/resources/ubl/index.htm#cva2sch
    
      XSLT 1.0 stylesheets for rendering CVA and genericode files in HTML:
    
       http://www.cranesoftwrights.com/resources/ubl/index.htm#codess
    
    As always, any feedback is very much appreciated.
    
    I'm thinking in the new year we should restart some CLRTC meetings 
    and if we don't get any more requests for technical changes we start 
    the OASIS standardization process for the CVA specification.
    
    Does anyone feel differently at this point?
    
    Thanks for your continued support of the committee work!
    
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken
    
    --
    Upcoming XSLT/XSL-FO hands-on courses:      Wellington, NZ 2009-01
    Training tools: Comprehensive interactive XSLT/XPath 1.0/2.0 video
    Video sample lesson:    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrNjJCh7Ppg
    Video course overview:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTiodiij6gE
    G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
    Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
    Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
    Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
    
    


  • 2.  RE: [codelist] Revision to the CVA specification

    Posted 11-13-2008 15:49
    Just an FYI . . .  The Electronic Court Filing Technical Committee
    recently approved as a committee draft version 4.0 of the ECF
    specification.  This version utilizes genricode for code lists defined
    on the court policy component of the specification.
    
    


  • 3.  Re: [codelist] Revision to the CVA specification

    Posted 12-05-2008 21:05
    Great news.  Is there a link to them anywhere?  Cheers, Tony.
    
    On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:48:19 -0000, Harris, Jim 


  • 4.  RE: [codelist] Revision to the CVA specification

    Posted 12-07-2008 08:13
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    The latest version of the ECF specs can be found at http://docs.oasis-open.org/legalxml-courtfiling/specs/ecf/v4.0/