OASIS Code List Representation TC

 View Only
  • 1.  Candidate OS package for genericode prepared for review

    Posted 02-01-2023 02:52
    Fellow Code List TC members, Please find here a candidate OS package for genericode for your review: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=70727 I found an egregious editorial oversight on my part, where the non-normative reference to the ISO/IEC web site for an ISO/IEC standard for genericode (which doesn't exist!), and the draft ISO/IEC layout PDF (which has no standing whatsoever!), never were removed after the drafting stages. As a result, they remained in the PDF and in the directories through the CS stage. Thank you for your patience with my mistake. I have cleaned up the OS package. I believe the removals constitute editorial changes only, and I await judgement from TC Admin. Please review the OS package and post any other oversights you may find. . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @US$125 (5 hours free) Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman


  • 2.  RE: [codelist] Candidate OS package for genericode prepared for review

    Posted 02-01-2023 16:49
      |   view attached
    Humble Ken,   Minor (non-egregious) edits aside,  you should be celebrating this major accomplishment today.   Congrats!   Jim Cabral Vice President, Court Relations 502-640-4970 Visit the site Check out the blog Contact us     From: G. Ken Holman Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2023 9:51 PM To: Code List Representation TC Subject: [codelist] Candidate OS package for genericode prepared for review   Fellow Code List TC members, Please find here a candidate OS package for genericode for your review: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=70727 I found an egregious editorial oversight on my part, where the non-normative reference to the ISO/IEC web site for an ISO/IEC standard for genericode (which doesn't exist!), and the draft ISO/IEC layout PDF (which has no standing whatsoever!), never were removed after the drafting stages. As a result, they remained in the PDF and in the directories through the CS stage. Thank you for your patience with my mistake. I have cleaned up the OS package. I believe the removals constitute editorial changes only, and I await judgement from TC Admin. Please review the OS package and post any other oversights you may find. . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @US$125 (5 hours free) Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php  


  • 3.  Re: [codelist] Candidate OS package for genericode prepared for review

    Posted 02-01-2023 17:42
    +100   Congrats.   I suspect few people other than you insiders  appreciate the pervasiveness of genericode  as a tool under the hood of so many  other key standards.   Jamie Sent from my mobile On Feb 1, 2023, at 08:48, Jim Cabral <Jim.Cabral@infotrack.com> wrote: ï Humble Ken,   Minor (non-egregious) edits aside,  you should be celebrating this major accomplishment today.   Congrats!   <BE3C44E1CEE944218E6EAD258C528AD5[58818687].png> Jim Cabral Vice President, Court Relations 502-640-4970 Visit the site Check out the blog Contact us     From: G. Ken Holman Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2023 9:51 PM To: Code List Representation TC Subject: [codelist] Candidate OS package for genericode prepared for review   Fellow Code List TC members, Please find here a candidate OS package for genericode for your review: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=70727 I found an egregious editorial oversight on my part, where the non-normative reference to the ISO/IEC web site for an ISO/IEC standard for genericode (which doesn't exist!), and the draft ISO/IEC layout PDF (which has no standing whatsoever!), never were removed after the drafting stages. As a result, they remained in the PDF and in the directories through the CS stage. Thank you for your patience with my mistake. I have cleaned up the OS package. I believe the removals constitute editorial changes only, and I await judgement from TC Admin. Please review the OS package and post any other oversights you may find. . . . . . . . Ken -- Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @US$125 (5 hours free) Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php  


  • 4.  Re: [codelist] Candidate OS package for genericode prepared for review

    Posted 02-01-2023 19:57
    Ken, thank you for your hard, dedicated and essential work, genericode would not exist without it. I concur that this final clean-up is purely editorial. I spotted another purely editorial issue, in citation format there is "OASIS OASIS Standard (OASIS repeated twice) Andrea > Il giorno 1 feb 2023, alle ore 03:50, G. Ken Holman <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> ha scritto: > > Fellow Code List TC members, > > Please find here a candidate OS package for genericode for your review: > > https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=70727 > > I found an egregious editorial oversight on my part, where the non-normative reference to the ISO/IEC web site for an ISO/IEC standard for genericode (which doesn't exist!), and the draft ISO/IEC layout PDF (which has no standing whatsoever!), never were removed after the drafting stages. As a result, they remained in the PDF and in the directories through the CS stage. > > Thank you for your patience with my mistake. I have cleaned up the OS package. I believe the removals constitute editorial changes only, and I await judgement from TC Admin. > > Please review the OS package and post any other oversights you may find. > > . . . . . . . Ken > > -- > Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ > Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources > Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @US$125 (5 hours free) > Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php


  • 5.  Re: [codelist] Candidate OS package for genericode prepared for review

    Posted 02-01-2023 21:52
    Well spotted, Andrea! https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=70733 As before, please advise of anything else you may find. . . . . . . Ken At 2023-02-01 20:56 +0100, Andrea Caccia wrote: Ken, thank you for your hard, dedicated and essential work, genericode would not exist without it. I concur that this final clean-up is purely editorial. I spotted another purely editorial issue, in ??citation format ?? there is "OASIS OASIS Standard ?? (OASIS repeated twice) Andrea > Il giorno 1 feb 2023, alle ore 03:50, G. Ken Holman <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> ha scritto: > > Fellow Code List TC members, > > Please find here a candidate OS package for genericode for your review: > > https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=70727 > > I found an egregious editorial oversight on my part, where the non-normative reference to the ISO/IEC web site for an ISO/IEC standard for genericode (which doesn't exist!), and the draft ISO/IEC layout PDF (which has no standing whatsoever!), never were removed after the drafting stages. As a result, they remained in the PDF and in the directories through the CS stage. > > Thank you for your patience with my mistake. I have cleaned up the OS package. I believe the removals constitute editorial changes only, and I await judgement from TC Admin. > > Please review the OS package and post any other oversights you may find. > > . . . . . . . Ken > -- Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @US$125 (5 hours free) Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman