OASIS IDtrust Steering Committee

 View Only

FW: [staff] FW: XML Daily Newslink. Wednesday, 21 January 2009

  • 1.  FW: [staff] FW: XML Daily Newslink. Wednesday, 21 January 2009

    Posted 01-22-2009 17:51
    
    These are the guys that Jane and I have been working with for several
    months. I feel pretty confident that we might come away with some new ideas.
    Best,
    Dee
    
    
    ====================================================
    Identity as a Service
    Martin Kuppinger, Blog
    
    Some days ago, I had a very interesting discussion with John de Santis and
    some of his colleagues from TriCipher, one of the vendors which provide IaaS
    (Identity as a Service) solutions, in that case particularly with their
    MyOneLogin service. That discussion is one among several I had with other
    vendors in the IaaS space like Multifactor Authentication, Arcot Systems, or
    Ping Identity... On the other hand, my colleague Joerg Resch (currently very
    active in organizing the European Identity Conference 2009, where we will
    have, amongst many other topics around thought leadership and best practice
    for IAM and GRC, definitely much content about IaaS) some weeks ago asked me
    about my opinion about approaches like Facebook Connect and related
    standards (Google Friend Connect, Myspace Data Availability) and, as a
    result, my overall opinion about IaaS. First of all, the positive things
    with all these initiatives is that they address the lock-in issues in todays
    social networks, which I've discussed more than a year ago in this blog...
    So where is the link between these two discussions? It is all about the way
    we can and should deal with identities in the future. In business as well as
    privately. First of all, identity is core to any of these initiatives like
    cloud computing and SaaS or Enterprise 2.0 or Web 2.0 -- even while many
    people haven't understood the impact of identity yet. How will you ever
    fulfill compliance requirements in an IT infrastructure which consists of
    multiple SaaS services provided by different companies as well as some still
    existing internal IT services?
    How is allowed to do what in that environment? Just think about SoD controls
    across multiple SaaS services: how do we control the way our employees act
    in the Internet, still representing our company? What about consistency and
    reliability there? How about the integration of Web 2.0 services into the
    enterprise, for corporate use -- that what sometimes is called Enterprise
    2.0.. We have some standards (like OpenID, Information Cards and the
    underlying federation standards, XACML...), some IaaS services (mainly for
    authentication and federation and some provisioning), and some proprietary
    approaches for exchanging information from social networks. Many areas like
    policy management and auditing aren't covered yet. And in the area of social
    networks, there should be one standard, which might make use of Information
    Cards instead of some vendor implementations. From my perspective, we are
    still at the very beginning of the IaaS market. We will need to create more
    standards and implement more use cases. There is a lot of room for vendors
    and service providers..."
    
    http://blogs.kuppingercole.com/kuppinger/2009/01/21/identity-as-a-service/
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Robin Cover [mailto:robin@oasis-open.org] 
    Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 12:08 PM
    To: XML Daily Newslink
    Subject: XML Daily Newslink. Wednesday, 21 January 2009
    
    XML Daily Newslink.  Wednesday, 21 January 2009
    A Cover Pages Publication http://xml.coverpages.org/
    Provided by OASIS http://www.oasis-open.org
    Edited by Robin Cover
    
    ====================================================
    This issue of XML Daily Newslink is sponsored by
    Sun Microsystems, Inc.  http://sun.com
    ====================================================
    
    HEADLINES:
    
    * Alfresco Labs 3.0 Final Version Supports CMIS
    * Draft W3C Social Web Incubator Group Charter
    * OASIS Announces Informal Public Review of BIAS SOAP Profile v1.0
    * Identity as a Service
    * Java API for RESTful Web Services (JAX-RS): First GA of RESTeasy Released
    * Vendors' Help Sought for NIEM's Next Step
    * Government's Management Challenge
    * Calls for Open Source Government
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Alfresco Labs 3.0 Final Version Supports CMIS
    Staff, Alfresco Announcement
    
    Alfresco Software has announced the release of Alfresco Labs 3 Final.
    This is a milestone release for Alfresco Labs, and is immediately
    available for download under the open source GPL license. According
    to said John Newton, CTO of Alfresco Software: "This release is
    designed to be the open source content services platform for all
    Alfresco and non-Alfresco content applications from document management
    and web content management to wikis. Alfresco has already utilized the
    emerging CMIS standard to integrate content services to other open
    source systems like Joomla, as well as offering integrations to MediaWiki,
    Open Office and WordPress. We strongly recommend that our open source
    community download this release." Alfresco has seen major adoption of
    its open source ECM system throughout the world. There have been over
    1.5 million downloads of Alfresco Labs. Alfresco Labs is designed to be
    the research vehicle for new features, enabling developers to access a
    nightly build with the latest functionality. The Alfresco Labs 3 build
    is a stable build with basic QA against an open source stack. Alfresco
    Enterprise is the supported Alfresco build and is used by more than 700
    enterprise customers, including the NYSE, Los Angeles Times, Boise
    Cascade, Sony Pictures, Activision, Kaplan, FedEx, and KLM. In the
    Alfresco Labs 3.0 Content Application Platform, support features for
    Web Content Management (1) Alfresco Web Studio: Drag-and-drop visual
    editor for end user site development, built on Alfresco SURF; (2)
    Alfresco SURF: AJAX enabled Web UI component framework, built on REST
    WCM API; (3) REST based WCM Services API; (4) Content Deployment:
    Replicated, transactional deployment from staging area to live site.
    Collaboration with Alfresco Share includes [i] Native SharePoint
    protocol support: Seamless document editing via SharePoint protocol;
    [ii] Flex Document Previewer: Zoom, snap points and full-screen; [iii]
    AJAX Calendar: Drag-and-drop event support; [iv] Links Directory
    Manager: Share internal and external links. Open Source Content Services
    Platform Integration features include Joomla! CMIS integration offering
    document library support for Joomla! sites, MediaWiki Quercus integration
    offering content services for MediaWiki content, and Open Office:
    Native Open Office access to Alfresco content services, contributed by
    Westernacher...
    
    http://xml.coverpages.org/AlfrescoLabsV30-CMIS.html
    See also Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) references:
    http://xml.coverpages.org/cmis.html
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Draft W3C Social Web Incubator Group Charter
    Harry Halpin, Posting to W3C public-social-web-talk
    
    An update was announced for the latest version of a draft charter to
    create a W3C Social Web Incubator Group. The W3C Incubator Activity is
    designed to foster rapid development, on a time scale of a year or less,
    of new Web-related concepts. Target concepts include innovative ideas
    for specifications, guidelines, and applications that are not (or not
    yet) clear candidates as Web standards developed through the more
    thorough process afforded by the W3C Recommendation Track. As proposed,
    the mission of the Social Web Incubator Group, part of the Incubator
    Activity, is to explore the development of social graph technologies
    and social media interoperability for the Web, built on existing W3C
    standards and open standards developed by the community, and to promote
    these solutions within the W3C.  Scope: "The focus will be insuring
    social data portability can be built on open standards and existing
    deployed APIs as deployed by vendors and the community. The group will
    work to promote the work of other non-W3C groups working on the Social
    Web within the W3C and raise awareness of the landscape of Social Web
    technologies within the W3C. The group will survey the needs of users
    of social web sites, and propose use-cases for social data portability
    to address these needs, with a focus on social data portability and
    relationships of trust and privacy. The group will determine if these
    use-cases can be built on top of existing standards and help determine
    what other standards are needed. Most importantly, mappings between
    currently widely deployed technical solutions for both users and
    developers will be developed on the level of semantics, with an various
    syntax options and even data models (XML, JSON, RDF) being capable of
    expressing this information. Ideally working converters in a variety
    of programming languages will be created for these mappings. Furthermore,
    although more still an area for research, privacy, trust, and security
    concerns should be addressed and the landscape of technologies in this
    area will be surveyed." Halpin writes: "Within two or three weeks,
    hopefully consensus will emerge on the charter and then we can finalize
    it. Since I've edited the draft, I feel like I've had my say already,
    so I'm going to let it go into the wild and see what happens and not
    maintain any control of it for the next bit of time.  Also, feel free
    to make major rewrites to the draft..." Any interested person is invited
    to contribute to the charter proposal.
    
    http://esw.w3.org/topic/SocialWebXGCharter
    See also the W3C posting:
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-social-web-talk/2009Jan/0005.html
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    OASIS Announces Informal Public Review of BIAS SOAP Profile v1.0
    Staff, OASIS Announcement
    
    Members of the OASIS Biometric Identity Assurance Services (BIAS)
    Integration Technical Committee are seeking review and comment on the
    current draft of the "Biometric Identity Assurance Services (BIAS) SOAP
    Profile, Version 1.0" specification. The 45-day review ends March 07,
    2009.  Feedback is invited especially relative to (1) Completeness of
    operations; (2) Is the message specification well-formed and follow
    expected usage/formats; (3) Identification of missing information; (4)
    Consistency with best practices and WS-I; (5) The open issues identified
    in provisional Annex F.  This profile specifies how to use the
    Extensible Markup Language (XML) defined in "ANSI INCITS 442-2008 --
    Biometric Identity Assurance Services" to invoke Simple Object Access
    Protocol (SOAP) -based services that implement BIAS operations.  These
    SOAP-based services enable an application to invoke biometric identity
    assurance operations remotely in a Services Oriented Architecture (SOA)
    infrastructure. This OASIS BIAS profile specifies the design concepts
    and architecture, data model and data dictionary, message structure and
    rules, and error handling necessary to invoke SOAP-based services that
    implement BIAS operations. Together, the BIAS standard and the BIAS
    profile provide an open framework for deploying and remotely invoking
    biometric-based identity assurance capabilities that can be readily
    accessed across an SOA infrastructure. This relationship allows the
    leveraging of the biometrics and web services expertise of the two
    standards development organizations. Existing standards are available
    in both domains and many of these standards will provide the foundation
    and underlying capabilities upon which the biometric services depend...
    In late 2005/early 2006, a gap was identified in the existing biometric
    standards portfolio with respect to biometric services.  The Biometric
    Identity Assurance Services standard proposal was for a collaborative
    effort between government and private industry to provide a services-
    based framework for delivering identity assurance capabilities, allowing
    for platform and application independence.  This standard proposal
    required the attention of two major technical disciplines: biometrics
    and service architectures.  The expertise of both disciplines was
    required to ensure the standard was technically sound, market relevant,
    and achieved widespread adoption.  The International Committee for
    Information Technology Standards (INCITS) M1 provided the standards
    leadership relevant to biometrics, defining the 'taxonomy' of biometric
    operations and data elements.  OASIS provided the standards leadership
    relevant to service architectures with an initial focus on web services,
    defining the schema and protocol.
    
    http://docs.oasis-open.org/bias/soap-profile/v1.0/biasprofile-1.0-wd-07.html
    See also the OASIS Biometric Identity Assurance Services (BIAS) Integration
    TC: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/bias/
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Identity as a Service
    Martin Kuppinger, Blog
    
    Some days ago, I had a very interesting discussion with John de Santis
    and some of his colleagues from TriCipher, one of the vendors which
    provide IaaS (Identity as a Service) solutions, in that case
    particularly with their MyOneLogin service. That discussion is one among
    several I had with other vendors in the IaaS space like Multifactor
    Authentication, Arcot Systems, or Ping Identity... On the other hand,
    my colleague Joerg Resch (currently very active in organizing the
    European Identity Conference 2009, where we will have, amongst many
    other topics around thought leadership and best practice for IAM and
    GRC, definitely much content about IaaS) some weeks ago asked me about
    my opinion about approaches like Facebook Connect and related standards
    (Google Friend Connect, Myspace Data Availability) and, as a result,
    my overall opinion about IaaS. First of all, the positive things with
    all these initiatives is that they address the lock-in issues in todays
    social networks, which I've discussed more than a year ago in this
    blog... So where is the link between these two discussions? It is all
    about the way we can and should deal with identities in the future. In
    business as well as privately. First of all, identity is core to any
    of these initiatives like cloud computing and SaaS or Enterprise 2.0 or
    Web 2.0 -- even while many people haven't understood the impact of
    identity yet. How will you ever fulfill compliance requirements in an
    IT infrastructure which consists of multiple SaaS services provided by
    different companies as well as some still existing internal IT services?
    How is allowed to do what in that environment? Just think about SoD
    controls across multiple SaaS services: how do we control the way our
    employees act in the Internet, still representing our company? What
    about consistency and reliability there? How about the integration of
    Web 2.0 services into the enterprise, for corporate use -- that what
    sometimes is called Enterprise 2.0.. We have some standards (like OpenID,
    Information Cards and the underlying federation standards, XACML...),
    some IaaS services (mainly for authentication and federation and some
    provisioning), and some proprietary approaches for exchanging information
    from social networks. Many areas like policy management and auditing
    aren't covered yet. And in the area of social networks, there should
    be one standard, which might make use of Information Cards instead of
    some vendor implementations. From my perspective, we are still at the
    very beginning of the IaaS market. We will need to create more standards
    and implement more use cases. There is a lot of room for vendors and
    service providers..."
    
    http://blogs.kuppingercole.com/kuppinger/2009/01/21/identity-as-a-service/
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Java API for RESTful Web Services (JAX-RS): First GA of RESTeasy Released
    Mark Little, InfoQueue
    
    One of the relative new comers to the REST-based frameworks and JSR 311
    compliant implementation space is RESTeasy, lead by Bill Burke, the first
    GA of which has now been released. According to the release announcement:
    "JBoss RESTEasy is a framework that allows you to write RESTFul Web
    Services in Java. It is a fully certified and portable implementation of
    JAX-RS specification. JAX-RS is a new JCP specification that provides a
    Java API for RESTful Web Services over the HTTP protocol. RESTEasy can
    run in any Servlet container, but tighter integration with the JBoss
    Application Server is also available to make the user experience nicer
    in that environment. While JAX-RS is only a server-side specification,
    RESTEasy has innovated to bring JAX-RS to the client through the RESTEasy
    JAX-RS Client Framework. This client-side framework allows you to map
    outgoing HTTP requests to remote servers using JAX-RS annotations and
    interface proxies..." Of course being a JBoss project there is good
    integration with JBoss Application Server, but it can run in any servlet
    container running JDK 5 or higher. There's also a client framework aspect
    to RESTeasy, something which is not part of the JAX-RS standard. Other
    features in the release include: (1) Embeddedable server implementation
    for junit testing; (2) Rich set of providers for: XML, JSON, YAML,
    Fastinfoset, Atom, etc; (3) JAXB marshalling into XML, JSON, Fastinfoset,
    and Atom as well as wrappers for arrays, lists, and sets of JAXB Objects;
    (4) Asynchronous HTTP (Comet) abstractions for JBoss Web, Tomcat 6, and
    Servlet 3.0; (5) EJB, Spring, and Spring MVC integration; (6) Client
    framework that leverages JAX-RS annotations so that you can write HTTP
    clients easily -- JAX-RS only defines server bindings... In a recent
    entry on Integrating JAX-RS and Spring MVC, Solomon Duskis reports that
    RESTEasy can now be used with the Spring MVC DispatcherServlet. All you
    need to do is [...] This has quite a few benefits: You can manage JAX-RS
    Resources along side SprngMVC Controllers, or Wicket Objects or Tapestry
    or Struts2 Actions. JAX-RS can be set up to handle XML and JSON
    interactions, and your favorite MVC framework can handle the HTML
    creation. Your JAX-RS resources can be full-fledged MVC Controllers by
    returning a Spring ModelAndView. It can be a JSP view, a Freemarker,
    XSLT or Velocity template, or an RSS view...
    
    http://www.infoq.com/news/2009/01/resteasy-ga
    See also JSR 311, JAX-RS 'The Java API for RESTful Web Services':
    http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=311
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Vendors' Help Sought for NIEM's Next Step
    Ben Bain, Federal Computer Week
    
    Technology integrators and commercial software providers are being
    asked for help as officials seek to expand the use of their common data
    standard to help information sharing... The NIEM program was launched
    in 2005 by the Homeland Security and Justice departments. Its users
    extend beyond homeland security and law enforcement, and officials
    want to expand adoption to a wide range of communities. NIEM gives
    users a standard vocabulary, guidance and processes to make data flow
    more effectively across various levels of government. The framework
    defines data components -- such as people, places events and things --
    and provides a method for communicating that data using Extensible
    Markup Language. To share information, officials use a packet that
    has the correct NIEM structure and semantics. The specifications for
    particular data exchanges are stored as Information Exchange Package
    Documentation.  NIEM program managers will hold an industry day on
    February 17, 2009 to expand the program to new users. The U.S. Homeland
    Security Department announced the event through a draft request for
    information on January 15, 2009; it said officials were seeking
    descriptions of products that have the potential to make the next
    generation of NIEM a reality. The final RFI is expected by February
    27, 2009... Officials say more software tools are needed as organizations
    look to roll out addition NIEM-based information sharing programs.
    The draft RFI said that NIEM's executive leadership believes that
    commercial software companies are best suited to provide the types
    of software tools to meet NIEM's needs.
    
    http://fcw.com/articles/2009/01/21/niem.aspx
    See also the National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) web site:
    http://www.niem.gov/
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Government's Management Challenge
    Faisal Hoque, Baseline Magazine
    
    In government, as well as in the private sector, making good things
    happen with technology is primarily management challenge, not a
    technological one. Technology investment must flow from a clearly
    articulated strategy, and technology must be deployed by and in
    organizational structures that are designed to make holistic decisions
    about technology -- and to take full advantage of it. President Barack
    Obama emphasizes open government and education, but there are many
    other [U.S.] national issues that technology can address, e.g., (1)
    The U.S. population grew nearly 20 percent between and 2001, but
    traffic increased 236 percent. Roadside sensors, radio frequency
    tags and global positioning systems can fit in where there is no room
    for more roads. A system in Stockholm resulted in 22 percent less and
    a 40 percent drop in emissions. London, Brisbane Singapore also are
    taking advantage of this technology. (2) Intelligent oil-field
    technology can increase both performance and well productivity in a
    business only 20 percent to 30 percent of the reservoir is extracted
    and turned into some form of energy. Meanwhile, lose between 40 percent
    and 70 percent of our electrical energy due to 'dumb' electric grids.
    (3) Electronic health records and networking could eventually save
    $81 billion annually. And Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE)
    increases patient by listing instructions for physicians to follow
    when prescribe drugs. If installed in all hospitals, CPOE potentially
    eliminate 200,000 adverse drug events save about $1 billion a year.
    (4) Establishing information-sharing mechanisms to improve homeland
    security. (5) Protecting the federal government's information systems
    and the nation's critical infrastructures...
    
    http://www.baselinemag.com/c/a/IT-Management/Governments-Management-Challeng
    e/
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Calls for Open Source Government
    Maggie Shiels, BBC News
    
    The secret to a more secure and cost effective government is through
    open source technologies and products. The claim comes from one of
    Silicon Valley's most respected business leaders Scott McNealy, a
    co-founder of Sun Microsystems. He revealed he has been asked to
    prepare a paper on the subject for the new administration. "It's
    intuitively obvious open source is more cost effective and productive
    than proprietary software," he said. "Open source does not require you
    to pay a penny to Microsoft or IBM or Oracle or any proprietary vendor
    any money." Improvements: Mr. McNealy told the BBC he wants to ensure
    the government does not get "locked in" to one specific vendor or
    company. "The government ought to mandate open source products based
    on open source reference implementations to improve security, get
    higher quality software, lower costs, higher reliability -- all the
    benefits that come with open software. [...] The Open Source Initiative,
    or OSI, is fully supportive of Mr McNealy's efforts which both believe
    is one of the main solutions the new President cannot afford to ignore.
    Mr McNealy says the benefits of open source products can't be ignored
    "Scott is absolutely correct about the benefits which have been
    demonstrated time and again," said OSI President Michael Tiemann.
    "It's an accident of history that proprietary standards became so
    entrenched so early and it's been a colossal expense for government."
    Mr Tiemann said while some departments already use open source
    technologies, overall it has been estimated that the global loss due
    to proprietary software is "in excess of $1 trillion a year." [...]
    Mr McNealy said a new cabinet post of chief information officer (CIO)
    was necessary to drive this fundamental root and branch change. He
    added that the CIO should "have veto power, the right to eliminate
    any hardware, software or networking product that touches the federal
    network...
    
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7841486.stm
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    XML Daily Newslink and Cover Pages are supported by OASIS
    Foundational Sponsors:
    
    IBM Corporation           http://www.ibm.com
    Microsoft Corporation     http://www.microsoft.com
    Oracle Corporation        http://www.oracle.com
    Primeton                  http://www.primeton.com
    Sun Microsystems, Inc.    http://sun.com
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    XML Daily Newslink: http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletter.html
    Newsletter archive: http://xml.coverpages.org/newsletterArchive.html
    Newsletter subscribe: newsletter-subscribe@xml.coverpages.org
    Newsletter unsubscribe: newsletter-unsubscribe@xml.coverpages.org
    Newsletter help: newsletter-help@xml.coverpages.org
    Cover Pages: http://xml.coverpages.org/
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
    generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
    https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php