OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC

 View Only

Re: [xliff] charclass and XLIFF namespace identifier

  • 1.  Re: [xliff] charclass and XLIFF namespace identifier

    Posted 04-17-2002 18:38
     MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    xliff message

    [Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


    Subject: Re: [xliff] charclass and XLIFF namespace identifier


    Hi All,
    
    In response to Yves's email  3/19/02 9:35:44 AM >>>
    
    -1- charclass Attribute
    
    Yves, Isn't CSS2 a style sheet specification? Does it allow me to
    restrict the translation to Katakana or 7-bit ASCII or Uppercase without
    forcing me to give other details? If I remember correctly, the reason we
    didn't use CSS2 here was we felt it was like using a sledgehammer where
    a tack hammer was needed. However, if it gives us what we want, i.e.
    restrict the translation to some character class, without imposing a lot
    of syntax, it could be acceptable. Does anyone know of something
    comparable but simpler?
    
    
    -2- XLIFF Namespace
    
    I didn't know if this was verified with Karl Best, Director of
    Technical Operations at OASIS, or not. According the RFC referenced, he
    maintains the namespace identifiers. So I contacted him. Our thread is
    included below. In summary, the namespace Yves proposes works. However,
    if this NSS is pointing at the spec, should we put in the type
    "document"; e.g. "urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:document:1.0"?  This is based
    on the the RFC3121, ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3121.txt.
    
    cheers,
    john
    
    
    >>> "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org> 4/17/02 11:38:33 AM >>>
    John:
    
    1. Given lack of resources and mechanisms for assigning and tracking
    URNs, I have made it a practice to assign to each TC a branch of the
    namespace tree and allow the TC to manage that themselves.
    
    2. Yes, the XLIFF TC owns urn:oasis:names:tc:xliff:*
    
    3. The specification branch should be resrved for approved OASIS
    specs;
    so until a spec is approved at the OASIS level it should exist only at
    the TC level in the URN tree.
    
    </karl>
    =================================================================
    Karl F. Best
    OASIS - Director, Technical Operations
    +1 978.667.5115 x206
    karl.best@oasis-open.org  http://www.oasis-open.org
    
    
    >