This seems to have posted three hours after I mailed it. In the meantime Yves and David already resolved this issue. Please ignore this email (pun unintended). From:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Schnabel, Bryan S Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:59 PM To: Yves Savourel;
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Call for dissent: csprd02 129 ignorable and fs (RE: Call for dissent: csprd02 ) Hi Yves, I think David was not referring to the content of <ignorable>. I think he was talking about ignoring its content and just using its presence as a placeholder for an HTML preview formatting device. For example (admittedly clunky): For this input: <unit id="1" xmlns:fs="fs" fs:fs="p"> <segment> <source fs:fs="b">First sentence.</source> <target fs:fs="i">Première phrase.</target> </segment> <ignorable fs:fs="br"> <source><!-- some RTF code "parpar" --></source> </ignorable> <segment> <source fs:fs="b">Second sentence.</source> </segment> </unit> Apply this XSL: <xsl:template match="*" priority="2"> <xsl:choose> <xsl:when test="@fs:fs"> <xsl:element name="{@fs:fs}"> <xsl:apply-templates /> </xsl:element> </xsl:when> <xsl:otherwise> <xsl:apply-templates /> </xsl:otherwise> </xsl:choose> </xsl:template> <xsl:template match="comment()" priority="3" /> And get this preview: <p> <b>First sentence.</b> <i>Première phrase.</i> <br/> <b>Second sentence.</b> </p> From:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:06 PM To:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [xliff] Call for dissent: csprd02 129 ignorable and fs (RE: Call for dissent: csprd02 ) Hi David, If there is an HTML “<br/>” element in <ignorable> it better be in a <data> associated with a <ph>. And the <ph> can have an fs:fs. Cheers, -yves From:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [ mailto:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org ] On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:39 PM To: Schnabel, Bryan S Cc:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [xliff] Call for dissent: csprd02 129 ignorable and fs (RE: Call for dissent: csprd02 ) Hi Bryan, Yves, while I agree that there is no need for fs on em, becuase there will always be a corresponding sm within a unit to karry the fs info Why not to have it on ignorable, the ignorable could e.g. be made <br/> or what not.. So sure the list needs to agree with the set of elements that actually allow it, but why not ignorable? Cheers dF Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC CNGL LT-Web CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734
http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452 mailto:
david.filip@ul.ie On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Schnabel, Bryan S <
bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com > wrote: Just resending this with an improved Subject line to enhance findability. CFD unchanged. From: Schnabel, Bryan S Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:23 PM To:
xliff@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Call for dissent: csprd02 I checked and Yves is correct <ignorable> and <em> do not have FS attributes. I propose removing them from the list of elements in the FS section. If I do not receive dissent by the end of the week I will consider this approved. Thanks, Bryan 129:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/201310/msg00015.html ignorable and fs Hi all, The section describing the fs:fs attribute says: "Used in: <file>, <unit>, <ignorable>, <notes>, <note>, <originalData>, <data>, <cp>, <sc>, <ec>, <ph>, <pc>, <mrk>, <sm> and <em>." It's incorrect: <ignorable>, <em> do not have fs attributes. Regards, -yves