OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC

 View Only
Back to discussions
Expand all | Collapse all

RE: [xliff] Re: XLIFF 1.2 Committee Draft Spec

  • 1.  RE: [xliff] Re: XLIFF 1.2 Committee Draft Spec

    Posted 05-09-2006 15:32 
     MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















    xliff message
    







    [Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]
    


    







    Subject: RE: [xliff] Re: XLIFF 1.2 Committee Draft Spec
    







    



    






    


    I favor option #2. It keeps the schedule
and helps motivate us to review—I know I tend to wait until the last day.
If for some reason many people can’t attend the conference call, then
option #3 become the back up plan. That is, vote next Tuesday if quorum is met,
otherwise, post it as an online ballot.
    


    


    


    Regards,
    


     
    


    Doug Domeny
    


    Software Analyst
    


     
    


    Ektron, Inc.
    


    +1 603 594-0249 x212
    


    http://www.ektron.com
    


     
    


    


    


    


    


    


    From: Tony
Jewtushenko [mailto:tony.jewtushenko@productinnovator.com]
    
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 11:00
AM
    
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
    
Cc: ddomeny@ektron.com
    
Subject: RE: [xliff] Re: XLIFF 1.2
Committee Draft Spec
    


    


    


    


    Thanks to allwho
submitted their spec issues.  While I can complete the
revisions to the spec spotted and submitted bar one, 
I couldn't get it done by the deadline for the ballot, which has in fact
passed (10am or even 11am EST).
    


    


    


     
    


    


    


    Although most of the
revisions are small,there are a lot of them and then there's the one pointed
out by Rudolfo regarding use of spaces in seg-source between mrk's which can't
be fixed by a simple revision.  We'll have to discuss it and make a
decision.  In any case I'll send out a revised 1.2 Committee Draft spec
late today that will address the typos, missing bits and details that were
submitted.
    


    


    


     
    


    


    


    We had twoscenarios
outlined as of last week for how the ballot would proceed: 
    


    


    


    1/publish finalcommittee
draft spec today - have 1 week ballot in time for next Tuesday's TC
meeting.
    


    


    


    2/if not published today,
spec would be published before next Tuesday and would have a role call ballot
to approve as Committee Draft.
    


    


    


     
    


    


    


    I would like to propose a
3rd option - to postpone the TC teleconference for one week until Tuesday 23
May, so we work towards publishing a final committee draft before next Tuesday
16 May, and set up a web ballot commencing 1 week before the TC teleconference.
    


    


    


     
    


    


    


    Option 1 is no longer
viable, - so we're down to 2 options still - #2 and #3. 
    


    


    


     
    


    


    


    Any thoughts?
    


    


    


     
    


    


    


    Regards,
    


    


    


    Tony
    


    


    


    


    


    



    
                                                
    
					
                                                    

        
                                                
				
    
                                                
    
                                                    
                                                
    
                                                
                                            
    
                                        
    

                                        
                                        

                                    
			

                                    
                                

                                
                                
    
                                
    
                            
		
                
        
    




            
        
    


	
    


    
    
         
    
    Related Content